It's funny that you mention the Dynavap M, because ever since I got mine about a week ago it has made me question if I even need a Hopper even with my VAS. My vapes are mostly around the house use so using an induction heater or torch lighter isn't a big deal, especially since it's about the same effort as heating a nail on a rig. Dynavap is also coming out with their own battery powered, waterproof induction heater which means no need to build your own coil or use a torch. If I'm going out to a ballgame, beach, bar or anywhere public I'm bringing a concentrate pen for ultimate stealth, but I also live in a medical state and have that access and understand others do not.
So do I really need a battery powered on demand one hitter vape? No, the M has exceeded my expectations and has been getting me seriously medicated with light packs, medium grinds, and on occasion adding some keif or extract like you mentioned but that isn't necessary for me as long as the strain is quality. It's also 4x cheaper, has no electronics to break and can be run over by a car and still work.
That being said, I've wanted a Grasshopper since I heard about them around '14/15 and have been hoping that they improved since I cancelled my order back in '15. The Dynavap M fits my needs for now but even then I still want a Hopper, but I remember the saying "doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results isn't patience, it's insanity." I've seen this company do the same song and dance as a lurker on this forum for years. They announce they have changed and offer some huge sale to lure people in, and then when people start to receive the new and improved Hoppers, some are already reporting issues like on /r/GrassHopperVape, others get no response and the typical extended wait period whether it's warranty or a new sale. All I know is it's the same stuff, same company and a different day. I don't expect anything different unless something changes, that would be insanity.
The key difference, as I was reintroduced whilst getting frustrated last night, is that a passively heated device is no good in the cold or wind. It does the job, and I got some satisfying bong hits, but it's very limiting compared to a hopper. More open airflow, much better flavour, larger chamber but it hits harder and just with a click on.
The labs definitely have a warped sense of marketeering and conductivity, but they're making it work as best they can. I keep saying it, but before the GH existed there was nothing like it because all these problems were foreseen. Even now, I don't see a single company with as much an ambitious design. It just happens to be the design that I value over all. I'm still months away from being reunited with them, but I'll be waiting months longer for a viable alternative.
I had an M for a while and can't even imagine it replacing my hopper. It's like saying an Athlon 64 from 2003 is just as good as an i7 8700k. Sure they'll both get the job done (eventually) but they'e really not comparable. The only reason the M even appears to milk things up so good is because of the insane draw restriction.
The air restriction certainly helps, but really if you're getting the bigger clouds from a Dynavap you're getting a broad spectrum hybrid offgas with light charring occuring from conduction on the outer layer of the herb. It doesn't have the power or dynamic to evenly distribute heat through the chamber. It does do a pretty good job, but it's a basic concept which is noticeable from the vapour quality. The best vapour quality from a vapcap is short-lived, even with the SS tip which retains heat best. An active heater makes a big difference, especially when it's hard to overpower.
Still compared to my starting point, the MFLB, the VapCap I'd actually bother using.
One provides a how-to while the other provides a how-not-to
They might both make vapes, but HL is an electrical engineering start up and Dynavap is a mechanical engineering start up and their products have polar opposite complexities at play.
If a student base was to examine either project, there's much to learn either way. But not by comparison. They're too different. Customer service is extremely easy at the sales end, made more so by a lack of returned product. Theres no insight there. Without that initial 30% failure rate, I'd imagine prioritising would be quite straightforward and things are going to flow easily, allowing a solid plan to come to fruition. When you attempt something considered impossible, it's going to be a rougher journey.
What I do find astounding, is that if GH ever gets their shit remotely together they will have a HUGE success on their hands. It's too bad they don't see that
I'm pretty sure that'd be their key motivating factor. They obviously have passion, but they're aware of what they've at least designed.
over the last three years as a small team controlling the bleed, catching up fulfilling orders of units and then losing money and time on warranty repairs that are backed up for months
This back up has been since Oct/Nov, before that problems were ripe but the turnover was reasonable.
if it can be better than that then I have no idea what's in store for me
Cut to the chase and get a Sublimator
Wow finally got a response. They said they are only in warranty requests from mid November. LOL. Guess I’ll see my hopper in November.
Yeah sounds about right