Not knowing exactly how the GH's electronics work I can only speculate on this. But the fact that there is no third path for temperature feedback, has me thinking they are using the same technology as the ecig guys have deployed. They do not use any temperature sensor but rather use ohm's law to calculate via a known coefficient. The newer devices have the winding made from pure nickel as an element.
Just started following this thread for a week or so. The unit sounds intriguing. Seems like it's met for a quick hidden toke.
Very interesting idea. No, that should be '
Another very interesting idea'.....
The use of Nickle is an obvious one, it has the highest (?) TC of common metals:
http://www.allaboutcircuits.com/textbook/direct-current/chpt-12/temperature-coefficient-resistance/
Ceramics might be a better choice (although more expensive). Fine control would be hard I think, and you'd have to shut heating down to make the measurement most likely but still a possible. However, as you suggest 'lead resistance' (through the threads) will add error as the above site discusses. And this error would vary with changes in thread resistances.
A common scheme in such control circuits is to take a baseline reading before heating to compensate for this, store that number and do calculations based on it in an attempt to get better accuracy. Here that won't work since the heater could already be warm/hot from previous use. And
changes in thread resistance would make life very tough......and we can expect thread resistance to vary wildly. When loose, the resistance goes up so it heats a lot quickly. Heating makes the metal expand, improving the contact, lowering the resistance again...... Not stable or repeatable. I can't see how any useful (precision) regulation could happen in such cases. e-cig guys no doubt '4 lead sense' and can live with much less precision (20 degrees error/change is nothing to them, but death in a precision herb vape?).
I think it'll be fun to eventually see how GH functions.
I agree, GH is best for a quick hit or two on the sly, and think most guys agree? Early on it was advertised as the ultimate do all vape, sure to kill off all lesser units. Hours (yes, hours.....) of use from that tiny battery. Many bought into it with intents for a 'daily driver' session vape with occasional party mode use based on those optimistic predictions. Needless to say much of that failed to 'pan out', for reasons pretty clear at this point.
It is, predictably, quite late in delivery. But units are finally making it into Member's hands with at least some reporting good results. IMO there's reason for optimism on this one. Problems exist, and a few are 'showing up' that would have been better addressed earlier on, but issues are also being addressed and hopefully 'put to bed'. I too am watching with considerable interest......and crossed fingers.
Thanks for the fun thoughts, even if it does need a dues paid geek to follow them?
OF