JoeMama
Well-Known Member
I am very...well, not excited but maybe hopeful...that the in-house process, assembly, test changes that Hopper makes will result finally in a reliable, testable, and hence repairable GH.
I love the function of my GH but cannot agree with the view that Hopper's quality and repairability has been at all acceptable since initial orders. Its the only thing that stops me from recommending it. Otherwise, I adore it.
I'm hoping that redesign of some parts coupled with control over QA and testing will result in GH's with less failures and RMA returns that are actually fixed rock solid. If they achieve this, I will buy another.
My thoughts, too. I really love the hopper, but I stop myself from recommending it without a strong disclaimer about the inevitable RMA's.
Brand new units have all new electronics, but old devices will only be upgraded as required still, it seems
So this makes me curious about what you'd call "new electronics", Molten...
Aside from the metalwork, I imagine that there are only three "replaceable" items: The backend, heater element, and the PCB.
Perhaps the PCB and the Heater are modular mates within the chamber area.
Perhaps the backend can be broken down and some internal parts can be replaced within it...
IMO, troubleshooting to the component level of the PCB's seems inefficient for a repair process... and I feel it's a better idea to just replace the PCB outright and repair and requalify the 'old' one for its re-use down-range.
This is all to say, from a manufacturing production point of view, it's hard to imagine a design in which the body electronics requires many sub-board-level items, and elaborate labor.
So this is why I say I'm curious about what "new electronics" is. Everything I've stated is, to be sure, complete conjecture on my part!