this is some kind of double standards.
you "believe" hopperlabs more ? As you say "they made an effort".
S&B has gone through scientific studies to proof it.
But i must agree as you say "health has become a business"
S&B were never in the discussion when I made comments about the standard of the hopper being relatively safer.
If HL got lab tests, it would also be for their benefit, not ours.
What I said before was a bit daft perhaps, I can't guarantee S&B did anything.
For all I know it was insurance companies, like in Canada as biokhacker mentions, who financed tests - but either way it's for marketability. Which is not shocking in anyway, or necessarily a bad thing. That it happened at all is great, but the motive is money not safety.
I've found no reason not to believe Trevor from Hopper Labs. He willingly did an 'ask me anything' and made many fair statements, and the entire history of HL and details of everything in and about the device has been available constantly.
I'm not trusting him much by believing him on this instance regarding the materials and how they can easily sustain the working conditions of the most considered vape design.
Maybe the VapCap is equally considered, both contain invaluable intellectual property and both are insanely great.
The S&B products are very great, but not insanely. That said, I believe them when anyone says they are safe devices. I've used them and seen their inner workings.
Same as the Pax 1, 2, 3.
The Solo is reasonable even though it has exposed PCB to the airpath, same as the hopper.
Only in my country does solder contain lead still, it flows better in its molten state and the mix is nicer to use. But even that wouldn't actually pose risk in these instances.
Everything's a business.
The Ghost MV1, I have queried Bud my alarm at the dynamic and material choice.
The company is well protected and actively opposes safe materials practice in my opinion.
A big difference between the shitty coil and the advanced shell heat exchanger between both devices, is the shell heater is capped at the set temperature. A coil must be cranked up to glowing temperatures, well above target temps, in order to transfer ample energy to remotely heat with convection from moving air. Why do you think a heat sink is arguably not needed with the GH. Both work very functionally similarly, a bit of a Samsung type of arrival albeit, but only one has a Stainless Steel enclosed chamber, medical grade brass heater, inert and advanced insulation and a design amply able to cope with temperatures well above the working conditions.
Not just Trevor's word or my word are enough to declare this, but the device speaks for itself.
I think HL have taken a considered approach to what is for me, a life saving device. It's their passion. They are not a hype machine or copy cats out to make a quick buck. I do trust what they say, but I value what they've apparently done more.
I'm still waiting to hear what type of silicone is in the MV1 from the engineers at Ghost Herbal Concepts (ltd) but I personally find it hard to believe they have a dyed, food-grade polysiloxane material that can sustain temperatures the device is capable of producing, given that clearly it has a glowing coil heater and silicone in the air and vapour path.
That is the underlying reason I mentioned what you quoted earlier as a valid point in the GH's favour, but I don't hold any manufacture to a different standard.
The fact the Volcano has scientific credence as to its medicinal potential is most excellent, and it has given substance to the idea that vaping is so clearly more beneficial than smoking.
What's needed properly, is some regulation where some third party gives a tick of approval to any acquirable device in order to validate the intent of the product designers and manufacturers, to deliver us the healthiest option feasible.
It's kind of the whole point of vaping, and why I think including it on my list of pros before was worthwhile. There's really no point buying a vape unless it's confidently safe, as it could be argued that smoking is safe.
Confidence is showing all the components of the device and talking about them in detail.
Arguing is saying you'll take legal action against anyone exposing real concerns and denying questionable material is even there!
No one is truly ever safe, but we can make things better for ourselves.
Edit: sorry these posts are so long winded btw. The kief in my had me convinced this was a short response but you know how it goes. Well, my bad