possibly it looks pretty cool but for now my basic NewVape controller has been working well. I been keeping my eye on it and maybe when it has a large screen I'll grab 1. I had saw them messing with integrating screens on the thread. In all honesty most of my dabs have been coming from the puffco peak for its ease of use for me and always being ready, that helped me decide to sell the hex nail and when I want to dab off a enail I use my Dnail sic halo on the NV controller. I'll be watching the Maxvapor nail though ty....and maybe the coming new MaxVapor controller could be a real alternative for you?
The RDK-300 is a wonderful device. I maybe in the minority, but to me most of the “added” features of “advanced” controllers are just tacked on bells and whistles.Since my Hexnail is currently a paperweight and I'm getting rid of NV controller...
What makes something like the Hexnail a 'better' controller (if it was working) than something like the Auber RDK300? Reason for asking, I recently got a banger and coil from @710Coils and paired it with a Auber RDK300 since that coil can't fit the NV controller. I've honestly been in love with it. Super easy to turn off/on, temp control seems to be on point, easy to adjust temp, etc.
That being said, I'm replacing my NV parts and want to get an additional controller (was hoping the HExnail would be working by now) so I can run the banger and FP at the same time. Just to clarify as well, I'm selling my NV controller and coil so that both coils can be interchanged if needed on the controllers. Just want it all compatible.
Should I get a more 'advanced' controller than the RDK-300 or just another RDK-300? I'm just trying to understand how much of a difference a more advanced controller really makes. I'm done with having the flashiest, I just want it to function and function well.
Shame on you, @HexNailAva!
But I'm very wondered, that none of you tech aficionados opened that "box of Pandora" for examination of construction before!?
@maxvapor710 That's a great point, thanks! A proper schematic is still good for self repairs on unmodified sd cards (and rehousing).
@scalescliffs Good to know, but my HN-02 definitely only has 1 discreet SSR.
@scalescliffs Thank you for clarifying; makes sense now I wonder if the changes required changes to the daemon itself, or just the environment. Regardless that would only matter for repairs, since the DIY project would have an environment specified for the specific hardware in the eventual tutorial. However, anyone needing to replace their SSR will have the SSR from their unit to inspect and determine which part to buy.
In regard to the DIY/community project, anyone have any thoughts on whether we should use hardware from existing devices or something else? For example, the SSR in my unit is discontinued, but still acquirable from some outlets; should we use a model that is still in production, instead? I still haven't bought parts, since I need to figure out whether or not I'll need to buy soldering gear as well (need to dig through storage), so if everyone thinks it would be better to use newer parts I'll buy those instead of exactly what is in my unit.