I will try to call them in the morning. If i cant get through ill try the E-mail route.
I think the cause of this fracture is the heat cycle this thing gets, the quality of the thermosetting polymer used and the strength and design of the cooling mouth peice mount. I cant see how this got through product testing.. surely a criteria high on the design lists was robustness, after all it is a portable.
I have been pretty gentle with my crafty in all honesty, its only left my house a few times and only ever been used by myself :-(and it's managed to not be dropped so far. I've been gentle to it because it's been a good friend to me over last few months & christmas, this thing is without doubt one of the best vapes out there for a portable, it just doesnt tick all the boxes in all the right places. The question is , is the superb taste and effects of this vape enough to justify its faults? i bet to some it will because it is pretty dam good at doing what it meant to do (when it does).
VJ
That's an interesting theory, isn't thermoset polymer unaffected by heat after it's fully cured?
I'd agree that the design and material thickness isn't great in that particular area.
I almost wonder if it's an issue of tolerances with that quarter turn lock mechanism.
If that quarter thread has some variance in it, the ones with poor tolerances could act like a pry bar and basically split the case apart when you turn it.
The testing done to the unit was probably to see if the cooling chamber fits into the bore of the vape. I really wonder if they did a
repeated twist test, because if they did; that shouldn't be performed by a machine, rather you'd want real hands doing the testing.
I'd venture to say that all Storz cooling chambers should fit; the problem isn't fitting in there, it's fitting in there
properly and standing up to real conditions and hundreds of uses.
I think by looking at how the material broke; we can use that information to understand how and why this thing is breaking for some people.