wonder if the vivape 2 is any better, haven't gotten any reviews or insight on it. just wanted to know if the air pump was any better cause it takes foreverrr to fill a bag with the vV1
thank for the insight SliM im sure this gives buyers a better idea of what they should buy when it comes to the pax and davinci, especially sense they are at the same price point, and 2012 products. i was highly considering the davinci before i saw the pax, but decided not to buy it only because...
WOW THIS IS GOLD, would you mind testing these adapters and put them into female joints with the elb's and see if its a nice fit (ie. diameter of elb is smaller than tip of male joint, or bigger and adapter fits wobbly in female joint) if it fits snugly is the ground glass piece of the adapter...
ive been watching the mivape for a while as well, i think it will be a good contender sense they have really taken there time with it to ensure a quality product (lets hope) but there is literally nothing on the product yet just a picture so that would be a huge gamble to pre-order just yet...
psht well most people are to cheap imo. the davinci is 250, solo 229, thermo vape t1 200, revolution 150, wisper 229. vapir n02 180. costs of all the vapes new. so 250 is a fair enough price and competitive for the market. if you disagree then im not sure maybe u should go ask all the other...
i wouldnt say its insulting at all, 250 is a fair price among other competitors first of all. second of all from the reviews from slightly medicated insist and prove that the pax is definitely a vaporizer of quality and produces nice clouds. its reliability is unknown yet, as it would be bias to...
if price isnt an issue for you then i would get the pax, if price is an issue i still wouldnt go with the no2. its really not portable and being a uni student just wouldnt be stealthy epically if u decided to use it on campus, i would get the mflb for price and how easy it is to conceal. if...
willing to pay XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX if anyone would like to sell pm me
modnote: if you are serious about this, take it to the classifieds (but read those rules first)
wow just phenomenal vapor/cloud production. this is definitely one of the most promising vapes of 2012, ive never felt soo good about an impulse buy/preorder before.
SM we really owe it to you for taking your time and effort to make these videos for the benefit of us all.
Your the man!!!!
now i...
well thats good to hear, it seems the pax has definitely kept up with the hype it had. im just eager to see the cloud production video, as SM attests to have nice thick cloud production through the unit, and do the temperature changes have a huge time factor in how quickly you can finish your bowl?
one thing id really like to know is if the unit truly does have 2 hours of continuous use? if not is the battery life more comparable to the solo or davinci because the solo is far superior in my books on battery life
hey, so im also in the ontario area ive been particularly interested in growing for medical patients. do you or any one of your friends need a grower, because i would like to get my legal license underway.
great to hear because im super interested on the number of hits, and was that a 15 min car ride with only one bowl packed with .26 in there? if so was it intensely vaped? the reason i ask is i want to know how quick you can get a session in, can you compare it to the speed of a desktop vaporizer...