Catching up . . .
Warranty is managed as an expense relative to revenue, expressed as a percentage. "Standards" are "set" through analysis of industry leaders (typically the largest companies). These essentially become "targets" aka performance standards.
In a consumer electronics analysis by a warranty trade journal comparing leadership warranty actuals to accruals, nearly all companies fell within the 2-3% range. The report cites 5% as the cut-off for a "manageable" level of warranty. Small immature manufacturers are very often above this mark.
Not sure if serious.
(my question) "What are those industry standards" =/= What does industry standards mean (what you answered). I'm not sure how you arrived at that, but the term is self-explanatory, especially in this context. Maybe I'm getting trolled, but I'll cut right to it. I was hoping there were some numbers to go along with vtacs statement rather than just reposting company damage control. The reason I wanted to know specifics is because my VXH products appear to have a higher failure rate than my other products. Since I'm just one person out of many, my personal experience could be an anomaly or common, but data is needed to support either conclusion.
I'm not sure what posting numbers of the broader consumer electronics industry does for you, but since I can't purchase or return my broken purchase to a consumer electronics store (such as Best Buy or Amazon), it does nothing for me. More importantly, it doesn't have much relevance when someone is cross-shopping the top vaporizers on the market.
tl;dr
If you have the failure rate of any of these units compared to competing units (in this specific industry) I'd like to see it.
I'm 1000% positive that I don't use prolonged inversion. I flip it and then hit it and immediately flip it back. During the flipping action I smell it most times.
To be completely honest I'm a little didsapointed that the official answer seems to be "ignore it". Especially since this wasn't an issue on the cloud tickers. Ive always felt that the ticker was a superior vaporizer, and the Evo feels more fragile and plastic, like it was made for less money and sold at the same price.
My concern here is that with a smell issue like this it is hard to feel like you have a top of the line premium vaporized that we all paid for. I have a bunch of vapes that don't smell like electronics, how come my most expensive and supposedly cleanest one has to smell?
I'd love for something to be done about this but I get the feeling nothing will. Now that others have verified the issue on their evos, I have to consider how much I want to use and recommend this vape if the official answer is that it isn't happening for SM, so just ignore the smell.
I'm sick enough for someone my age, the last thing I Want is to be questioning mystery smells from my top of the line expensive vaporizer.
I had these same concerns and issues with VXH. Many members here are willing to overlook these issues because VXH was started by members from this very forum. However, for someone like me that's new to vaping, I have no history with them. Only lighter pockets and broken parts. Given my experience with my Cloud+, I thought it was crazy to take chance on a full price Evo, but the hype was strong, and my short time with the Cloud+ was great. and However within a month I'm sending it back in for repair. Which I will assume will be at my expense as shipping already is. I try not to complain about VXH on these boards as the fanboys come to their rescue quickly, but your opinion sounds just like mine, so realize you're not the only one. I'm in over $1k in VXH products and they haven't had much in the way of reliability or customer service. Like Dubya says "fool me once...."