Planck
believes in Dog
I bet DuckDuckGo knows.Does “sanctioned” mean “verboten”
I sanction its use.
These IH seem like a pita to setup. Alcohol lamp FTW.
I bet DuckDuckGo knows.Does “sanctioned” mean “verboten”
Magnetism beats alcohol burners.
No, not at all a common issue.Thanks for the suggestion. Is this a common issue?
Anyone else out there need to stop before the click to prevent combustion?
No setup required with either of my Fluxers. Coil height is adjustable if you want to play with it but I've never messed with mine. If it ain't broke, don't fix it.These IH seem like a pita to setup. Alcohol lamp FTW.
So much for battery independence, aye?
The difference is: once the battery of for example a Mighty fucks up, that's it. If the battery of your IH fucks up, you still have many options to keep going. So much for battery independence. :-)
@invertedisdead – I used the Mighty as an example for a device that actually depends on batteries. As opposed to a Dynavap.
Sorry yes, following a previous post I rarely put @-anyone on there. And yes, I have a longstanding question to know if the early run of '20-M's had thinner caps that was later corrected or if they are still 12% thinner than previous caps to make the captive dimple. Regardless, it is less mass in the cap itself. The previous post reported denting a cap... related?
I pack a tight bowl with super fine grind. I extract the bulk of that in about 2 draws making the first the money hit. This takes some care in heating and I do that with a very well tuned induction heater. The '18 and '19 extract nearly identically. Same technique with '20-M will get you light ABV and scorching along the tip-walls, 50% longer to the click, and whimpy draws. Can't do it all in two with sip&dip and any other method.
The '19-M was the first improvement in draw resistance. I took that to another level with both '18 and '19 tips. '20-M indeed have excellent minimal draw resistance. Love the '20-M stem, although I don't do metal stems as a rule. Basically, the '20 didn't stand up to the standard and certainly didn't blow it away. My standard, I admit; fine grind and persistent reheating for max extraction rate, yet, the profound difference is my observation in how I react to the '20-M. It has similar tones to how others reacted at the time. Therefore my question will stand on the cap until it is known. Not many people are able to provide an accurate measurement. Mine too has a margin of error at 12% but it is definitely thinner.
And I have some empirical evidence as well that there is a 'big change' in how it presents in an IH; it "magnetically couples significantly less" than the '19 and '18-Ms. The impression I was left with after the initial attempts was "dry heaves" talking of the straw colored ABV and the hot 'nothing' hits it presented. Reminded me of Kansas in late August during a drought. My '19 t&c are like the Pacific Northwest luscious coastal forests. Dark full extraction while dancing with the devil herself.
Interesting indeed @RustyOldNail Do you think my conspiracy theory has merit?
Beginner question? Recent new Omni XL Titanium unit. I broke the condenser using it to push out the screen for cleaning. Trying to determine if I have to spend $ 95 to get whole from my mistake or if they sell a separate Omni XL condenser without the mouthpiece?
Just so you know, the Omni condenser is 2 pieces that thread together -- the mouthpiece and the condenser tube are separate. Perhaps you haven't broken anything?Beginner question? Recent new Omni XL Titanium unit. I broke the condenser using it to push out the screen for cleaning. Trying to determine if I have to spend $ 95 to get whole from my mistake or if they sell a separate Omni XL condenser without the mouthpiece?
Just so you know, the Omni condenser is 2 pieces that thread together -- the mouthpiece and the condenser tube are separate. Perhaps you haven't broken anything?
Post a picture of your issue if possible.
For the record, pushing out the screen with the condenser (either Omni or regular) is the recommended method and so you should be covered if it is broken...
@TommyDee
Here as a favor to you, are the most accurate tests I have the time to conduct. Hopefully this is helpful with your database.
My (3) Dynavap tips & caps.
NOTES:
Measurements done with Mitutoyo digital calipers.
Heat up times were done in slow SKJ IH dental heater, as opposed to my Fluxer, easier to log and record longer times. All tips tested on plain glass stem, from cold start.
TITANIUM TIP, (came with Simrell stem)
TIP weight, no cap: 3.25 grams.
CAP thickness: .15mm
IH Heat time (approx): 18 seconds
2020 SS TIP, with CAPTIVE CAP
TIP weight, no cap: 5.94 grams.
CAPTIVE CAP thickness: .15mm
IH Heat time (approx): 19-20 seconds.
2019 “Karma” SS TIP with standard cap.
TIP weight, no cap: 5.44 grams.
CAP thickness: .15mm
IH Heat time (approx): 12-13 seconds.
While heatup times vary, I do not see any cap thickness differences on the 3 I own.