This is an analytical data-point and I want to add the Ti tip data when I get it.
This is also anecdotal as I don't have anything but this data and the hearsay of the forum.
When I put the '18, '19, and '20 through the IH, all else being equal, these are the force coupling I see on my IH;
Test; power one IH with the VC and take a wattage reading on an empty tip and cap on a wooden stem -
'18 10.3 volts @ 6.0 amps = 61 watts
'19 10.3 volts @ 5.4 amps = 56 watts
'20 10.5 volts @ 4.2 amps = 44 watts
And I concur that the heating levels experienced by each of these is commensurate with these findings.
This makes what I say in my book a fairly 'conclusive' set of data with regard to IH coupling.
Essentially, anyone can duplicate this data with an IH and current and volt meter.
There is a very small jump between the '18 and '19. I suspect geometry has everything to do with it. I have a lot less tendency to combust with the '19.
The '20 cap also seems to be made of a thinner metal. This could account for as much as 10% mass loss over the previous caps. The clicker weights the same, yet the thin cap certainly measures thinner on my end. Production variance or a specific design change? Not sure but if someone can take a measurement to their's, that would be good to know for completeness. If this is the case, then yes, there is less mass to heat up. But the other factors is that the cap and tip are no longer in close proximity to each other. This affects convection coupling to some extent but I don't know how that would change the inductive coupling. Something in the '20 tip has fundamentally changed the heating profile that we've all come to love up to the moment of combustion. Did George eliminate combustion in a '20-M VC?
There are a ton more experiments that could be done but I thought this would be interesting to understand there is actual data to support some of these wild comments from others and myself. I prefer a hot cap and full extraction in minimal draws. My modified '18 tip and cap is that rig for me.
edit; I just measured the caps alone in the IH. Sure enough, the '20 cap couples with ~15% less energy in the IH. I got 11.1v@4.1 amps for the '20 cap and 11.1v@5.3a on the '18 and '19 caps. The '20 cap has changed significantly in inductive coupling.