I'm jealous you people with a functional cloud. I'm so frustrated with their horrible customer support.
I'm jealous you people with a functional cloud. I'm so frustrated with their horrible customer support.
The failure rate is ~2%. No need to worry IMO.Weird question as I haven't read through this thread, since I cannot afford my cloud yet, I don't really wan to inform myself too deeply about a product I am mystified by LOL
Why do your clouds need replacement? Is this a common problem, an isolated problem, or various problems. I wouldn't buy my cloud with the glass, just the vaporizer device itself, I don't want to worry about getting several replacements in a year.
Since we've had a more than one person have two clouds break on them it's interesting to consider: With a pure 2% failure rate what are the odds of that happening? It's 0.04% or 1 in 2500. I personally would assume the majority of people who had a $500 product break on them would tend to be even more cautious with it's replacement. They must hate surge suppressors.The failure rate is ~2%. No need to worry IMO.
I agree with this 100%! The problem is a customer can only share a laugh with you if you're willing to communicate with them. If you just ignore them they have every right to be upset.I really appreciated the ones who could laugh about it with me and make it not so bad for both of us. Try to roll with it...I know...easy for me to say as I pull a medicinal strain through my Cloud/Matrix rig.
Sure, given a failure rate of 2%, you'd only expect someone to have 2 clouds fail 0.04% of the time, but after the 1st cloud breaks, once youve got the 2nd one in your hands, there's still a 2% chance it will fail...
There's not really any difference between someone's 2nd (or 3rd, or 12th) cloud breaking than some other persons 1st cloud
Basically what I'm saying is, it's 2%, no need to look further into it than that.
My goodness - I'm so high I can't understand a lick of that
This may be true if you take the statistic as the likelihood of having someone have 2 units fail when they have never had a single one fail, however, after the 1st unit has failed, the likelihood of the 2nd unit failing is still 2% (ie. there is always a 1/50 chance that their current Cloud will break)Since we've had a more than one person have two clouds break on them it's interesting to consider: With a pure 2% failure rate what are the odds of that happening? It's 0.04% or 1 in 2500. I personally would assume the majority of people who had a $500 product break on them would tend to be even more cautious with it's replacement. They must hate surge suppressors.
I did take statistics (way too much) ... don't question my education please and I won't question yoursNone of you took statistics did you? Lol
I could explain it mathematically but just look at it this way. You guys are saying you are just as likely to win the lottery 100 times as winning it one time. This is an incorrect assumption.
Yes, I agree.you are correct that the odds for a person to have a Cloud fail twice is 2% * 2% = 0.04%
If you choose to view all incidents separately, which we are not. If you flip a coin there is a 1 out of 2 chance it will be heads. The odds of getting heads on two consecutive flips is 1 out of 4. This is all mathematical fact, my friend.however, the odds that it fails again now according to the statistics are still just 2%
No, that makes absolutely no sense at all.your odds don't magically get worse to win the lottery a second time if you won it the first time ... however, the odds of winning it twice having never won it at all are astronomical ... make sense? ...
I keep seeing people being cautioned from reading too much into anecdotal evidence in this thread, and I totally agree with that. I brought up the whole failure rate because that 2% figure is just as anecdotal as any of the other posts in this thread.
This is called the gambler's fallacy.If you chose to view all incidents separately, which we are not. If you flip a coin there is a 1 out of 2 chance it will be heads. The odds of getting heads on two consecutive flips is 1 out of 4. This is all mathematical fact, my friend.
Ha, no this this is a beast that produces thick vapor clouds. Very stinky.How is the smell on this vape? Would I be able to use it with parents in a room next to mine without them noticing?
Gambler's fallacy would be if I claimed there was 25% odds on the second coin toss, which I didn't.This is called the gambler's fallacy.
The wikipedia article will verify this for you if you don't believe it.The odds of getting heads on two consecutive flips is 1 out of 4. This is all mathematical fact, my friend.
How is the smell on this vape? Would I be able to use it with parents in a room next to mine without them noticing?