• We are experiencing temporary outages. Keep trying, it does recover. We hope to rectify this as soon as possible.

TinyMight / TM 2

ginolicious

Well-Known Member
How would I know if the retailer I am purchasing from has the updated version of the walnut?

I am looking at purchasing from either planet of the vapes Canadian site or Toronto vaporizer. Toronto vaporizer has it for the cheapest price and I’m getting another 5% discount code. I just don’t want old inventory.
 
ginolicious,

dench

Member
How would I know if the retailer I am purchasing from has the updated version of the walnut?

I am looking at purchasing from either planet of the vapes Canadian site or Toronto vaporizer. Toronto vaporizer has it for the cheapest price and I’m getting another 5% discount code. I just don’t want old inventory.
Updated version of the walnut? What was wrong with this the walnut?
 
dench,

dench

Member
this is the cheapest I found


not sure if anyone has ordered from here before?
$349 but this is its usual price, even on the official website it is the same price.
On April 20th you could find a sale for $267
I thought there were already sales somewhere to celebrate the release of the new one TM3
 
dench,
How would I know if the retailer I am purchasing from has the updated version of the walnut?

At this point, pretty much any 'new' product has to have the button updates, etc., etc., that were incorporated after initial release of TM2.

There just isn't 'New Old Stock' sitting on shelves, bc the manufacturer makes smaller runs of these (IOW, they make them by the hundreds / low thousands, versus, say, 500K run).

When the PH version came out, it was advertised as having all the v. 2.2 goodies. And that's been a couple of years ago (approx?) Couple that with tight inventory and Minimum Advertised Pricing (note sales only happen at predefined times, for very short periods)... and ANY new walnut you find from a major reseller (POTV, VG, etc.) should now be like its upgraded PH counterpart.

TL; DR: I would buy with confidence, as any *new* product should be the latest / greatest. That's been advertised for some time now, really.

PS: The enhancements, such as they were could probably be retrofitted to any existing (unshipped) product they had left in Finland. Because they were subcomponents. A couple of minutes with a Torx / screwdriver, and 'voila!' Updated version! Just hold the old stock until the new parts come in, then repackage & release to market.
 

Cheebsy

Fermentation Fiend
What is it about TM users that they love to make up version designations? There was no 1.5, it was many tiny improvements along the way, same thing so far with the TM 2. There hasn't been an announcement about tm3 either AFAIK. A new colour version certainly isn't going to be the next revision, just an expansion of the current line up.

PS: The enhancements, such as they were could probably be retrofitted to any existing (unshipped) product
I don't think this is entirely true. One of the changes in the ph model was more robust ceramic rods within the heater assembly. I would assume they would need to finish selling the old heater assemblies before switching over to the new version as I imagine replacing just those rods is far from trivial. To me though it wouldn't make sense to have two distinct heater assemblies going forward. This is purely speculation though.
 
Cheebsy,
  • Like
Reactions: Pib
What is it about TM users that they love to make up version designations? There was no 1.5, it was many tiny improvements along the way, same thing so far with the TM 2. There hasn't been an announcement about tm3 either AFAIK. A new colour version certainly isn't going to be the next revision, just an expansion of the current line up.
Well, people like to shorthand when possible when writing on sites like this. That's why I used '2.2', even though there isn't one. Most people here are familiar with the 'Tinymight Timeline' :)

But you know what? Imma get the trademark now for the black one: TM 2.2.Bk :lol:
(yes, technically, it's a line extension, vs a new model. But... *you can't stop me!* Bwaahaahaahaa! )
This is purely speculation though.
As were my thoughts. More from a 'career in business' standpoint, vs. "I work at <name of Finland company> " standpoint. Just a guess. :shrug:
 
Bakin4Life,
  • Like
Reactions: Cheebsy

Cheebsy

Fermentation Fiend
Well, people like to shorthand when possible when writing on sites like this. That's why I used '2.2',
Yeah, I get that. However with the "1.5" there were several revisions all still being called "1.5" which then got really confusing when people were asking about details because it was never an official designation. Once that 1.5 ball was rolling there was no stopping it!

I do understand, I just don't like it! Lol. Sorry, I'll go back to being a miserable git lol.
 
Cheebsy,
  • Haha
Reactions: Bakin4Life
it seems to be one of if not the most popular dhv no? with such honor it would be ideal to have easily designated lineage and as others just pointed out, concern of old inventory or tweaks could be controlled/designated/identified easier.. maybe... no?... too much of an ask? I know they are still a young growing company but just spit balling, certainly see some deficiencies in the details of their operation/growing pains are apparent.
 
OlfactoryHue,
I know they are still a young growing company but just spit balling, certainly see some deficiencies in the details of their operation/growing pains are apparent.

I'd buy another / upgrade from the TM folks just based on the fact that they actually REPLY to e-mails, when sent. #KiddingNotKidding
That, plus you can see both on the inside / outside... no quality / material shortcuts.
When something proves out to need revision -- they do it.
And they originally issued a 10yr warranty on the thing. Not anymore (it's 3), but still... that shouts "quality" to a potential customer, IMO.

The 'deficiencies' probably run along the line of less real-world / demo / sustainability testing than optimal, so that the user base does some of that for them. But if you think that's uncommon (even concerning multinational software corps, for example)... it's not.

There was a learning curve for me, and I'd like a larger load size (w/o using the OEM stem). But I'd buy another at this point, as long as it's not just a wood color change. A piece of sandpaper, a brush, and a small can of wood stain can take care of that, easily.
 
Bakin4Life,
  • Like
Reactions: Cheebsy

jbm

Well-Known Member
When something proves out to need revision -- they do it.
And they originally issued a 10yr warranty on the thing. Not anymore (it's 3), but still... that shouts "quality" to a potential customer, IMO.
I don’t know that I’d call cutting the warranty by 2/3 with no notice to existing customers “quality,” but whatever. I have 2 v2s, one upgraded from an OG, and I like them, but I don’t have the same devotion to it that many people do. I actually find it a bit off putting.
 
jbm,

ginolicious

Well-Known Member
I don’t know that I’d call cutting the warranty by 2/3 with no notice to existing customers “quality,” but whatever. I have 2 v2s, one upgraded from an OG, and I like them, but I don’t have the same devotion to it that many people do. I actually find it a bit off putting.
What are the reasons?

Im in process of buying one. Would love to hear your thoughts. My purchases are always educated and I take a very long time to pull the trigger.
 
ginolicious,
Top Bottom