I use em all. Vaporizer discrimination has no place in modern society
.
Direct for me, whips for use with the other half, bags for groups and when i want to get ripped without moving.
I also prefer bags (forced-air) for selective extraction, the automated airflow allows the temperature knob to better control load temp - removing variables with open-loop control improves repeatability.
So if i wanted to keep the temps low, and have conviction in that outcome i would gravitate to forced-air over direct or whip with our line.
I understand preference, but there is logic behind every configuration.
You won't find whip vapes in any medical studies or journals, as bags are better suited to patient care by removing the patient from the process to ensure repeatability and reliability.
Whips offer flexibility of course, at the cost of taste - though i consider that of negligible importance when compared to the smell factor, which again isn't an issue for me. I open my mouth enough to make smells the least of my worries, plus if your whip smells more than your bud - its a sign to migrate to greener pastures
.
Direct offers a better taste by utilization of inert materials, though their inherent rigidity imposes constraints on moving the mouthpiece.
Where did directdraw come from anyway, as in the terminology?
The only difference between whip and directdraw is the material type used, what i mean by this is if i use a whip composed of sufficiently inert material - it could be considered analogous to flexible glass, so what is this frankenstein monster classified as?