How is the shipping time for a brand new SS unit?
I think a lot of us had a bad experience with grasshoppers at one time or another, maybe several times. Although occasional failures are inevitable, and some patience could be required, reliability (and hit quality) has improved with the (stronger) io. From my experience, HL will honor the warranty and keep you up and running most of the time. I definitely agree that a plain SS model is the safest bet.Am I crazy for wanting to buy a new unit? I had some bad experience like 5 years ago.
I believe I saw in another thread that you are in Brazil?Am I crazy for wanting to buy a new unit? I had some bad experience like 5 years ago.
You are at a disadvantage without that part, and without having seen its' function.I don't remember seeing any sort of copper in there, just SS threads. Maybe I lost a part.
Just a wee bit off topic. This could clog the thread with ot answers. I think there are places to start surveys, contests, etc.Tonight’s NO PRIZE CONTEST.
*There are clues on FC, but since the only prize is the TITLE: “BEST BALL GUESSER”, don’t waste your time looking for clues...
GUESS how MANY 6mm Quartz balls in the MF Oribitor pictured below. (Hopper IO for scale)
View attachment 13797
Edit: 1250GUESS how MANY 6mm Quartz balls in the MF Oribitor pictured below. (Hopper IO for scale)
500GUESS how MANY 6mm Quartz balls in the MF Oribitor pictured below. (Hopper IO for scale)
174GUESS how MANY 6mm Quartz balls in the MF Oribitor pictured below. (Hopper IO for scale)
Tonight’s NO PRIZE CONTEST.
*There are clues on FC, but since the only prize is the TITLE: “BEST BALL GUESSER”, don’t waste your time looking for clues...
GUESS how MANY 6mm Quartz balls in the MF Oribitor pictured below. (Hopper IO for scale)
View attachment 13797
View attachment 13818
I received an answer from support this morning. They say to use high temp thread lock and hand tighten the front end.
https://www.forbes.com/sites/chrisr...rong-and-so-is-everyone-else/?sh=67d17362ee35
This article is a year old but it might explain why I can be satisfied stretching my io loads for 11 hits. If the premise of the article is correct, the stronger weed only means that one needs less to get stoned, and all THC highs are basically the same regardless of how much you inhale. I know this probably doesn't tell the whole story. But I also know that some of my most memorable highs happened after I laid off awhile so it's possibly true.
The author suggests that instead of THC we should focus on the array of other compounds when looking for weed. To begin to test the theory, I stopped by a dispensary and found an ounce of 18% sativa for $100. The interesting thing is that it contains 2.45% terpenes, considerably higher than two other sativas I looked at. It's a little beat up but it smells great, can't upload a picture at the moment(??). (Note: Won't be able to smell dispensary weed much longer here, switching to sealed packages in a month or two.)
Anyway it seems to work fine in the io. Not the best low temp hits I've ever had, but close enough. Excellent flavor at low temps, heavy vapor at the high temps. At that price, I feel like I should hit it more often, but haven't felt the urge, yet.
This is potentially relevant in that I believe the io's design and (precise) functionality makes it possible to squeeze all of the compounds out of a load by slowly advancing the temperature according to one's own schedule. Maybe this a legitimate technical reason to not buy the more expensive weed. I try to use more, even buying cheaper weed, but always come back to the same 10-12 hits per load. Comments?
Seems you enjoy “temp stepping” and the “entourage effect”. I’ve been temp stepping on most of my devices for a long time, as most do. It’s a bit easier on devices with a digital temperature readout. The IO’s dial is not very precise but useable. There are tons of charts showing which compounds are released at various temperatures, and the entourage effects are also always part of the discussion.
I made a poll about this though and the overwhelming majority noted a quick and heavy extraction as being more effective.
What style of vaporizing do you find most effective?
Been thinking about this one for a while, wanted to take a poll to see what style of vaping FC members find is the most effective for them: slow drawn out sessions, or fast and heavy extraction? Or do you rely on both methods to help keep things fresh? I'm also really curious about microdosers...fuckcombustion.com