I respectfully disagree ,
So how is a consumer able to tell if it's new or used , if they're reissuing the same serial #'s . I believe it's DV covering their butts on this one .
IF they are NEW units , they should have NEW batch #'s , plain
and simple . Maybe that's where the confusion is at . jmo
Disagree away. I'm quoting what the maker told us on this Forum (I believe). Argue with him?
While I get what you think (and of course you can think what you want) that's not what seems to be happening? I suggest the confusion is self inflicted.......
If there are laws protecting consumers from the above mentioned 'practice', would they not frown app-on the practice of re-issuing serial numbers?
Different cases. The law about selling new stuff has nothing to do with serial numbers, production dates and so on. It allows you, for instance, to strip units you've never sold for parts and sell the assembled product as new.....been there too.
We've been through this before, I think most folks don't stop to consider that
there's no requirement for serial numbers on such products at all. 'Serial numbers or other identifying marks' are required on autos, firearms and some few similar products. Vapes need not have any at all, and in fact I'd say most vapes made do not?
It's the maker's choice. He could use the same number on every copy (not advised when printing your own money......). He can also skip numbers, or (as we see) reuse them. This is not uncommon.
The same company I worked for that got busted was a very small player in a big bucks market. We, of course, serial numbered our gear for warranty control but to confuse the enemy (our competitors) we'd often skip blocks of numbers to make production look bigger to those trying to figure out our volume. On the large product this was an engraved plate riveted to the frame. The plates came engraved, of course, but were not sequential. Our logs and paperwork sorted it all out, of course, but they were confidential and without them basically impossible for others to use. Our own, private, production code secret.
If you put yourself in the maker's place you can probably see how 'I don't want that one, I read on the internet, it's defective' is not a discussion they want to be in. Date codes have the same issues, which is why they're in code I suspect?
OF