kingofnull
ace
Splash guard I think. I don`t much prefer it either.
The FC Bubbler by PlanetVape
- Thread starter PlanetHaze
- Start date
- Status
Frederick McGuire
Aggressively Loungey
AFAIK, it is intended to be a splash guard.
I personally would play with water levels to stop it from bubbling up into the neck to begin with before I relied on it as a splash guard.
Aesthetically though, I like it, gives the piece a bit more of its own unique character.
Frederick McGuire
Aggressively Loungey
The bub designed around FC input, and you want them to leave the FC logo off it?
It's not gonna be a big gaudy label, I'd say it should stay
kingofnull
ace
ataxian, I know you love your Black Leaf piece, but it's not really fair or appropriate to post photos in another member/retailer's glass thread. My
kingofnull
ace
Planet Vape sells that Black Leaf bubbler, but it's not made by them.
placetime
Well-Known Member
Frederick McGuire
Aggressively Loungey
My understanding was that it was going to be similar to the logo found at the top of the page.
It might be different, I'm not 100% sure (its been a while since I read this thread).
Either way, on stealth terms, once someone sees your glassware, it's kinda past the point where anything labelled on it is gonna matter. (unless maybe its labelled "Vase"
)I'd also figure that "Black Leaf" is just as bad (worse maybe?) than "Fuck Combustion" as a brand for stealth purposes, unless it's the "naughty language" factor that bothers you? (I just bring up black leaf since you seem to be OK with that branding on the bubbler you posted above?)
I guess I'd be surprised to hear of someone who was OK with MMJ, but still couldn't handle some grown-up words...
But I think I'll leave that point there since it's getting a bit off topic for this thread...
The logo is meant to be on the downstem only, not exactly going to be overt or gaudy. If the piece is full of water, you'd be hard pressed to even see it.
ataxian
PALE BLUE DOT
As soon as my Medication Area is done I will trow away my bubbler and buy a new one with out logos!Frederick McGuire said:(I just bring up black leaf since you seem to be OK with that branding on the bubbler you posted above?)
I guess I'd be surprised to hear of someone who was OK with MMJ, but still couldn't handle some grown-up words...
But I think I'll leave that point there since it's getting a bit off topic for this thread...
Dreamerr
Always in a state of confusion and silliness♀
You people have GOT to stop doing this to me. My hubby is starting to get cranky!
.......sigh.........
Don't worry about your husband cause it is usually them spending...just tell him I said it is ok
smokum
I am who I am and your approval isn't needed!
Don't worry about your husband cause it is usually them spending...just tell him I said it is ok
Just because you ladies spend it on clothes & shoes doesn't mean OUR purchases are frivolous... toys & necessities are deemed as such in the eyes of the beholder
u bwade wunner
Well-Known Member
A little bit of FC Girlpower..I like it
BlazedRunner
run high
The current FC bubbler looks pretty good. I have been using the middle-end Vapor Brothers Hydrator and what I imagine is something with
(1) a nice stable base so it won't easily get knocked over
(2) vapor inlet set as low as possible, so if it's attached via hose there is less risk of the hose pulling on it and tipping it over. plus, the shortest, most direct route is ideal for efficiency.
(3) as few corners in the flow-path as possible.
(4) good widely dispersed diffusion (showerhead or inline), which is also quieter. Sometimes the bubbling noise bugs me.
This bubbler seems to have all of those qualities, although I have never used a mouthpiece with that shape before. It would be nice to have the option of having an outlet hose rather than a fixed glass stem. But I like what I see. I'd be willing to pay at least $150 for that and if it's cheaper then I will definitely buy.
(1) a nice stable base so it won't easily get knocked over
(2) vapor inlet set as low as possible, so if it's attached via hose there is less risk of the hose pulling on it and tipping it over. plus, the shortest, most direct route is ideal for efficiency.
(3) as few corners in the flow-path as possible.
(4) good widely dispersed diffusion (showerhead or inline), which is also quieter. Sometimes the bubbling noise bugs me.
This bubbler seems to have all of those qualities, although I have never used a mouthpiece with that shape before. It would be nice to have the option of having an outlet hose rather than a fixed glass stem. But I like what I see. I'd be willing to pay at least $150 for that and if it's cheaper then I will definitely buy.
kingofnull
ace
Outlet hose?
Frederick McGuire
Aggressively Loungey
I'm guessing he means something like a removable mouthpiece, so you could stick a whip in there instead of a glass mouthpiece, leaving the piece on the table and hitting it via whip?
Doesn't sound the most practical to me, but I've heard it mentioned a few times across various threads...
I'd be way to scared of the tension on the hose tipping the piece
BlazedRunner
run high
I'm guessing he means something like a removable mouthpiece, so you could stick a whip in there instead of a glass mouthpiece, leaving the piece on the table and hitting it via whip?
Doesn't sound the most practical to me, but I've heard it mentioned a few times across various threads...
I'd be way to scared of the tension on the hose tipping the piece
yes, that's what I meant. If nothing else it would be nice to be able to replace the mouthpiece with one of your choice.
TommydCat
Well-Known Member
I'm loving this design, but can there be an option for a 14mm mouthpiece joint where that "splashguard" is now? This is where the infamous bubbler is currently killing it for me - it's an in-line bubbler while still allowing me to use a whip (or another bubbler!). It wouldn't have to be a cheap option
Yoshimattsu
Well-Known Member
I'll buy it!!
- Status