if you click on the link from an iPhone, it plays without being friends/following or whatever. I just watched em from my iPhone with no problem, but cannot from my macs web browser, as I'm not following him...Just a thought!Both pieces look amazing...but the massive one with the slightly worked section...holy oh my shit! I should've sold myself on the street and gone for that packageIs there any other way to view these? I sent eyesmoke a request well over a month ago on instagram and apparently never got accepted.
Oh man that makes me want the bent neck, that can is like bigger than 65mm??Single chamber should be fixed now - http://instagram.com/p/eNyMhLRDnp/
Is there any other way to view these? I sent eyesmoke a request well over a month ago on instagram and apparently never got accepted.
Oh man that makes me want the bent neck, that can is like bigger than 65mm??
I miss those two opals (1st proto had 5 opals) but I guess I can live with three
Looking Great!
Did someone ask for videos????
Double Chamber - http://instagram.com/p/eNxpihxDmu/
Single Chamber - http://instagram.com/p/eNyMhLRDnp/
Let the drooling BEGIN
is that the 500 and 1000 level? aww i thought the 500 level was a double turbine : (
http://instagram.com/p/chRgnSRDsd/#
Yes that's what I thought as well. There must be a record of this somewhere. Maybe we misunderstood?
For the record, the $500 level is a single chamber (50mm can) with a turbine and the $1000 (65MM can to 50MM) is a double chamber with a turbine. We went through several different prototypes (including double turbines, too much drag) with Swagger and the last two videos are the ones that we are going with. Trust me, no ones going to be disappointed.
Trust me, no ones going to be disappointed.
Hello,
I'm not meaning to rude but I preordered after seeing a written undertaking from the glass manufacturer and company CEO (along with a video from manufacturer!) that that we would be receiving a variation of a double turbine tube as part of the $500 perk contribution.
If this is no longer to be the case I am both logically and legally entitled to a refund on this section of the contribution. The filtration afforded by a double turbine was my reason for the additional $150 pledge, A single chamber serves the same function as products I have already purchased from vapex.
I feel like someone just jumped the gun on returning it over a little detail like that without even trying it ;\, poor tyke.No problem, send us a support ticket. FWIW, the double turbine would've been sub par in this application, it just didn't work as good as we expected it to. No reason in choosing a set up that doesn't perform well for the sake of wow factor.
Good news everyone, an Early Bird just opened up, anyone interested in taking his unit just PM me.
EDIT (TAKEN)
We went through several different prototypes (including double turbines, too much drag)
Whether he wants a refund or opts to keep it, whatever makes him happy is fine by me.Something tells me he never really intended to return it. The way that comment was worded, he obviously knows his way around the procedures of doing a return. So logic would dictate that someone knowing that would go through an official channel to try to garner their refund.
No, out in the open, candid like this with the whole forum watching? He wasn't trying to start a return, he was fishing. I wouldn't be surprised if he still tries to keep his unit, either out of actually wanting it or just trying to spite SM.
I don't remember anything of the sort, ever. No double turbine at the $500 level was ever promised to my memory. And its not too much drag for the Cloud, its too much drag for the inhaler . . .
$500 = single CHAMBER
$1000 = double CHAMBERED
BOTH have A turbine.