TinyMight / TM 2

[Cheesequake]

So quite honestly, who cares?

I'm glad someone brought it up again because I totally missed it at first and it's going to make it a lot harder for me to order one knowing who is probably behind the device.

and will stick with other forums that are actually supportive of up and coming artisan makers

Good luck finding one more supportive than FC. You're not allowed to say hardly anything negative about anyone or anything here
Lots of members (myself included) had really bad experiences with the person in question, and if the TinyMight is made by an actual different company I think they would be wise to speak up and say so.

 

[Siebter]

Lots of members (myself included) had really bad experiences with the person in question, and if the TinyMight is made by an actual different company I think they would be wise to speak up and say so.

This request has been brought up and discussed numerous times already, it turns out that it's not up to us to decide what would be wise or not. Just to save you having to read those numerous discussions.

 

[Facticity]

@Facticity - this vape is =tuned= for how its built. It has already been noted that changing shit changes other shit. If better performance has to beat already excellent, then I'm going to put my money on changing shit would make performance worse. I know. I change a lot of shit for the better. You might have to be high to follow that

I feel you. Seeing things improve for the better is one of the best things about following the progression of dry herb vapes and the innovation that comes with each successive generation.

In the Tinymight's case, it isn't so much that it has added something that has never been seen before, but rather it has combined multiple "already excellent" elements into a single unit that shines in what it does.

 

[sickmanfraud]

In regards to all wooden stems, I don't believe it would be a good idea. The stem would go all the way down pretty much to the heater, and that would cause the wood to either get too hot and burn, or could release oils in the wood that might not be healthy to the user. I will still probably make a couple for testing purposes to prove my theories wrong, but otherwise, I think the all glass air path with the wood sleeve would be the safest option

Is there a possibility of making a "non-breakable" stem that uses dosing capsules between the heater and the wood? That configuration would allow wood stems but keep the wood further away from the heater.

I remember a discussion in one of @Bravesst's threads about the distance between the heater and the cannabis was a few millimeters and I have not heard about any problems with those wood stems.

If a regular RBT stem can fit mouth end inserted into the TM can you use an Xl8r stem (mouth end first) so you have more glass in your airpath?

@khelek41girl are you allowed to sell outside the USA? The Shipping costs from Finland are about 2.5 times as much as USPS charges to Israel.

@Siebter, have you ever seen an unmodified Sinous P80? The mod is not that much larger than the 18650 battery and the electronics are tiny. If you can hold a P80 in your hands you would realize it is a small mod.

 

[pakalolo]

That's fine, but I dont need to try a vape to point out its square with corners and not pocketable by its looks alone. I can see that from a picture. I dont need to try it to make that comparison..

In other words, why I can't I compare and discuss the Tinymights non square corner appearance to the tetra80's squared, cornered appearance?

Certainly seen pocketablity discussions in other threads....

Same with digital versus analog discussions. There is no need to try the vape to make those, and discuss those, comparisons... it's just preference and opinion. Not speculation.

Because you don't need to compare it to anything to make that point. Let me remind you of this rule:

Good luck finding one more supportive than FC. You're not allowed to say hardly anything negative about anyone or anything here

This is complete bullshit and you've been here long enough to know this. You're more than welcome to find another forum that allows people to post anything negative that they want, however. Enjoy reddit!

 

[Brewervapesalot]

The TinyMight has shipped. Day after DHS arrival

 

[MonkeyTime]

The TinyMight has shipped. Day after DHS arrival

Did you get shipping info? I can see my reorder is now complete also, but not sure it's shipped. Still excited!

 

[Siebter]

@Siebter, have you ever seen an unmodified Sinous P80? The mod is not that much larger than the 18650 battery and the electronics are tiny. If you can hold a P80 in your hands you would realize it is a small mod.

I have, and I agree that it is very compact – however, I wasn't comparing the Tinymight to the P80, but to Lamarts Tetra P80.

I can see my reorder is now complete also, but not sure it's shipped. Still excited!

You should get an email from DHL sometime soon.

 

[Brewervapesalot]

BTW he was not telling you that you couldn't say that because you didn't try it, he was telling you that you are not supposed to be talking about the Tetra at all in the tinymight thread! Sorry this is just a classic FC rule that often feels like a gray area, but there has been so much irrelevant discussion here in the TM thread now. This is pretty typical for a vape that has not really been released yet though, all the shipping talk, comparison speculation, and hypothetical analysis... It's not really what the thread is for.

Whatever man.... no one follows this vague overly broad rule from all the posts I've read to the degree I would have had no idea to even infer such a rule, in any shape or form, even existed. I try to respect it, but in no way do I think it's particularly helpful. I actually think you bringing the rule up is what led to the discussion going off topic...

But I am excited about getting this vaporizer. Got all the little accessories, extra stems, extra cooling unit, extra batteries, and i intend vape the living hell out of this thing. Will be sure to give a full review with ABSOLUTELY NO COMPARISONS TO OTHER VAPORIZERS (I'm not sure how that's remotely helpful to anyone), but gotta follow rules I guess! I might end up saying it's the best vaporizer ever, or the worst, or something in between, but I think that statement is barred by rules because I'd be explicitly comparing it to other vaporizers.

(In contrast, the post by another, that apparently broke the rules (naughty!) and which explicitly compared the tinymights flavor to the FW5 was extremely helpful to me.)

I particularly want to know how the vapor stacks up in terms of taste and clouds. But without the ability to compare to other vaporizers, you'll just have to my guess at what my subjectively descriptive, yet utterly vacuous, statements with no reference point mean. Ill try it makes a big cloud or small clouds or it taste great or poor... it will be really interesting read, like marketing advertisements that make the same statements but have no actual meaning to the reader.

Any way, the TinyMight will be in my pocket with some mistvape capsules (hopefully that statement is okay). Especially before a Christmas party with the in-laws extended family, who after several years I still can't figure out, but I think some of whom indulge in secret.

Did you get shipping info? I can see my reorder is now complete also, but not sure it's shipped. Still excited!

Yes, I got a tracking number and information direct from DHL, with estimated arrival date.

 

[Siebter]

@Brewervapesalot – I don't think the mods mean it as dogmatic as you seem to see it now. I'm sure it's okay to mention other vaporizers *as long as it serves clarification* and won't turn into a lengthy discussion about some other device. This thread has seen a lot of off-topic discussion already, which might be the reason why the mods want to see us being closer to the actual topic.

 

[sarkunit]

Because you don't need to compare it to anything to make that point. Let me remind you of this rule:



This is complete bullshit and you've been here long enough to know this. You're more than welcome to find another forum that allows people to post anything negative that they want, however. Enjoy reddit!

If your response to criticism is to use profanity and ask people to leave, I think maybe you might need to step down as a moderator. I understand I will be penalized for saying this, and am fine with it. I understand the difficulties you have, but this kind of response (the if you don't like it, leave) reminds me of the behavior that has driven me out of political discussion. Is it not okay for people to feel in different ways and relate this? This is your site, and your land, but man, I hurt inside when people act like this.

 

[Brewervapesalot]

@Brewervapesalot – I don't think the mods mean it as dogmatic as you seem to see it now. I'm sure it's okay to mention other vaporizers *as long as it serves clarification* and won't turn into a lengthy discussion about some other device. This thread has seen a lot of off-topic discussion already, which might be the reason why the mods want to see us being closer to the actual topic.

I get it. This is private forum and it can do what it wants. For a reference point though, in the legal world, overly broad and vague rules are at best unenforceable and at worst unconstitutional. My point being that this rule wasn't exactly well thought out or written.

The rule to be more sincere, and less arbitrary and more upfront, should just state moderators can direct people to talk about what they want and not what they don't want to talk about.

I am not trying to be argumentive and appreciate your input. I just think the "actual topic" to me in this thread is how the TinyMight stacks up against other vaporizers. Without a point of reference, descriptive statements mean very little.

Moreover, until we get more vaporizers in hand, what the hell else do we have to talk about? I was just talking about which vaporizer I should buy and why; the TinyMight or another. Something we were all thinking.

 

[Siebter]

@Brewervapesalot – Again: I'm sure it's okay to use reference points. But look what happens to this thread again and again. The structure of fc does not allow long winding offtopic discussions because they would make threads hard to read for anyone joining a discussion or trying to find valid info.

I also think that discussions about forum rules should be held elsewhere (FC community → Community discussion).

 

[Baron23]

I am not trying to be argumentive

Haha I’d hate to see what happens if you really do try ;-)

@khelek41girl - I sympathize and I believe I know where you were coming from. But nonetheless feel your screed was out of line. Going to leave it at that. We all have less than optimum times, yeah. :-)

I don’t see anything wrong w a good metal air path

 

[TommyDee]

Let us know how it works out for you @Baron23 . Be sure to do an honest assessment comparing the glass to a metal column. Similar to the dosing capsule evaluation. Of course you also took into account that the metal will be very thick or specially machined to account for matching the OD and the ID Since the OD has a seal as well as the ID. And since the seals are nearly the same elevation, either you do a lot of machining or the unit gets heavier. Thermal and condensation characteristics will also change. Significantly? Looking forward to your most excellent analysis.

 

[Shit Snacks]

I am not trying to be argumentive and appreciate your input. I just think the "actual topic" to me in this thread is how the TinyMight stacks up against other vaporizers. Without a point of reference, descriptive statements mean very little.

Okay, but to be clear, this is NOT what the thread is, that is not the "actual topic" and that is precisely what I was informing you of. You say you're not trying to be argumentative, but then you have a counterpoint rebuttal for every explanation of why what you're doing is not appropriate or relevant here... I explained that it can be a gray area, and it is all how you are framing it, based on the entire content of your post. You were discussing many details of another vape (a vape you never tried or saw in person, which personally irks me, but yes thats not against a rule) as inferior to the vape in this thread (another one you have yet to try or see in person), or as you say it is objectively "unpocketable" which I personally find incredibly subjective actually, and not helpful for the thread... and it is absolutely possible to write a review without comparing to another product, without being mere marketing fluff either.

Sorry if it feels like I'm the one keeping us off topic, but you really don't seem to understand the rule so I am trying to make things clear since you seem to be new er ish to FC. You can compare if you are not saying anything negative about another product, and you are framing everything in relation to the vape in this thread (ideally with facts not conjecture, though of course all opinions are welcome). If you want to specifically discuss comparing vapes, the way you described above, then you should start a new thread in AskFC where you can compare every aspect of any vape however you like.

Anyway I am glad you got your shipping notice, I did as well, so this thread will finally have some actual content in it soon..Thankfully its DHL because I had to change my delivery address, they were sending to the billing address (which is across the country from me) by mistake lol

 

[Siebter]

I am glad you got your shipping notice, I did as well, so this thread will finally have some actual content in it soon...

I'm very much looking forward to what both of you will report about this device.

 

[YaMon]

The VAS with this one got the better of me, I submitted my order this morning! Merry Christmas to me a couple of days early. Works out well as the misses and I decided not to do gifts this year with the hole cancer thing still going on.

 

[khelek41girl]

At this point, I think I will be following the lead of TinyMight and will no longer be participating in this thread.

I will speak when directly spoken to through PMs but I am done participating in threads. The overall toxicity here is palpable, and while I may have let my personal frustrations get the better of me earlier, that will not happen again.

All PMs that are of a personal nature will be ignored and all product related questions will be answered in kind. I was labeled a retailer even though I am a maker first and foremost, and now because of that title, I am required to hold my tongue. So hold it I will.

I apologize to the mods for breaking any rules, and I apologize to the people for trying to stop needless drama. Best of luck to you all

 

[Baron23]

Let us know how it works out for you @Baron23 . Be sure to do an honest assessment comparing the glass to a metal column. Similar to the dosing capsule evaluation. Of course you also took into account that the metal will be very thick or specially machined to account for matching the OD and the ID Since the OD has a seal as well as the ID. And since the seals are nearly the same elevation, either you do a lot of machining or the unit gets heavier. Thermal and condensation characteristics will also change. Significantly? Looking forward to your most excellent analysis.

WTF are you going off on me about, pal.

All I said was I don’t mind metal in the air path. If you do, fine.

Good day to you v

 

[RelaxedNow]

Yep, I caved in and placed an order a moment ago.

I was going to hold out for U.S. distribution, but the timing of that seems uncertain and I NEED this vape. It’s possible that @khelek41girl will receive her inventory before I receive my unit, but that’s cool because I’ll buy at least one more if I have the opportunity.....my wife needs her own, and I know a couple of other people who might like a nice gift in coming months.

I’m also looking forward to seeing what kgirl or others might come up with in a more durable stem. I’m not terribly unlucky with glass, but accidents have been known to happen.

 

[pakalolo]

Wow.

First let me remind everyone of this rule, to which you all agreed when you joined:

• Rules are interpreted and applied at staff discretion.

I know some of you will react with horror but without this rule, we'd wind up with a complete zero-tolerance policy that would upset far more of you. Regardless of the legal world, which this most certainly isn't, the rules actually were well considered and have been worded exactly as intended. I suggest to you, @Brewervapesalot, that not many lawyers moderate forums, and any that have much experience at it will see immediately why these rules are written the way that they are.

Next I remind you that there just two of us and we can't monitor every single thread. Even if we could, the off-topic post rule is easily the one that most benefits from the rule I quoted above. No matter what we do, there will always be those who feel we are letting the topic wander too far. Without the rule against discussing staff decisions, we'd have even more off-topic discussion about what was really on-topic. In this case, we got reports about the thread, which is the only way I would have know that it was happening. (I can't speak for @Stu.) If you think a thread is off-topic, report it. We might do something about it, but if it corrects itself quickly then probably not.

Finally, as to my use of profanity in a forum called FUCKcombustion, allow me to take a break here to shit my pants laughing.

If someone wants to criticize FC by accusing us of not allowing negative comments, I suggest they find a job working for any well-known fake news originator. Or use reddit, as I already mentioned. I have no idea why anyone would think we should tolerate someone making completely false claims in criticism of FC. I should make that person feel welcome? I think not.

 

[Cheesequake]

The overall toxicity here is palpable

This is complete bullshit and you've been here long enough to know this. You're more than welcome to find another forum that allows people to post anything negative that they want, however. Enjoy reddit!

I think I'll stick around, thanks!

This request has been brought up and discussed numerous times already, it turns out that it's not up to us to decide what would be wise or not. Just to save you having to read those numerous discussions.

The point is moot, @stickstones already confirmed that the manufacturer is in fact ville. I'm out. May buy one second hand later down the road if people continue to rave about it.

 

[TommyDee]

WTF are you going off on me about, pal.

All I said was I don’t mind metal in the air path. If you do, fine.

Good day to you v

I wasn't going off, I was just saying if you do modify your TM to use a metal tube instead of glass to please report back as to how the change affected the performance. What I detailed were some of the more obvious limitations and performance risks.

 

[Baron23]

I wasn't going off, I was just saying if you do modify your TM to use a metal tube instead of glass to please report back as to how the change affected the performance. What I detailed were some of the more obvious limitations and performance risks.

Brother, what I’m trying to tell you is that you are coming back at the wrong person. I don’t have a TM and have not advocated modifying it or any thing else.

I merely stated that a full metal air path, and let me add “in general” is fine by me.

Perhaps reread my post?