I'm not really understanding all the dislike for the Wand. I'm not one to let aesthetics get in the way of function. The Wand is really good at what it does, it's rugged and I've never had problems with it. I find the batteries last quite a while and I'm glad it uses 2x18650s.
I bought it for dynavaps (for which it's great) but unexpectedly it's worked for the Dani, the Convector, the Stunner and soon I trust it'll work for the Tempest when I get one. It's surprised me at how versatile it is.
Honestly, for it's price and how well it functions, I wouldn't be surprised if it's the most owned induction heater by dry herb vapers. I also like the fact that it's designed in a way that you can put objects straight through the coil.
Sorry, I feel like I was part of what kicked off that sentiment... To clarify I would agree the function is important and it does seem to be working quite well for most!
Having never use a IH before the Wand I don't really understand peoples dislike for it, I only got it out of the box to use with the Tempest as it didn't add value over a torch for the Anvil or a Dynavap, but for the Tempest I am really liking it. The only thing for me is that I need a noise on timeout (or click discs in my Tempest) as I have walked away and come back to a cold device and had to start again (its not as bad as my ball vapes, I have come back to smoke a few times)
Honestly it always felt a little janky to me, using it as an IH for other vapes, since it was designed for bangers (I was tempted by that feature as well but ultimately not the style and way it is used, compared to my dabbing style) and a little clunky I guess? Simultaneously simple which I found appealing, though also complex, which really turned me off repeatedly (all the parts, what it comes with and what you might need extra to fit properly, standard swappable batteries is good but for some reason in this application it kind of annoyed me? Similar to the full one degree digital temp, normally something appreciated, but in this situation these are things that kept keeping me from grabbing one since they came out)
I'm also sorta confused why ergonomics is a concern with the wand. Every other worthwhile IH on the market is a square block, they're like the least ergonomic thing possible if you need to hold it over a water piece or something. At least the wand is shaped like a remote and it fits easily in all of my storage bags.
I love my Wand, I never once thought "this is awkward to operate" while using it. The tempest "future proofing" is icing on the cake. I would have been real sad if I had gotten the YLL2.0 instead haha.
Yeah not really ergonomics exactly, and that sense it does seem well designed for practical home in the hand use? Just something about the form factor I don't like though, whether it is aesthetics exactly, or something more as I was describing above... Yeah I guess I'm not so keen on having to hold it like that at all? Would be nice to just stick it in something, that itself is stationary even if you have to continue to hold the tempest while it heats... Vapman Station is my main comparison point as well, since I've never tried IH with my vapcap OG ever, and that one is so unique hands-free while heating up, would be cool to do that with one of these, more like passive heating (although that is risky if you get distracted I must admit!)
That said I like the wand and am glad I have it. I travel a lot and a wand travels much better than a torch and a can of butane.
Yeah it is very affordable, would make sense with the case and everything, easy to pack and grab, especially long-term as you describe...
Plus it’s a far better dab rig than I think most people realize. Probably wouldn’t surprise you that I like a big torch on quartz for dabs; but I’d put a wand dab above any other electric dab I’ve had.
Yeah exactly I just like using hot start torch too also pre-clean each time lol I still need to try my BAK banger for edabs... it's just so easy to be lazy and stick with what you know, maybe someday I will grab it and try the full experience, thanks!
I personally love the wand , im never using a torch again....the wand gives me a perfect roast everytime so why would I want the hassle of firing a torch at my Tempest and making lthe cap look burnt to shit
Yeah this sounds so much more like me, so I really should not discount it, or have to wait for something more dedicated that will be more expensive too... Maybe the next big sales, by then I should have a tempest too!
I have had a wand for ages and I think I had one of the earlier ones that came out., used it with a DV as my main way of vaping outside of a moderately priced electric unit. I like the functionality of it, but it is large for when I am out and about. It is not a bad unit by any means but I would love a IH that has a timeout feature I can set easily (like the wand) but is smaller and boxier, think the size of a pack of smokes in length. I am not saying for a minute that is possible. I don't know if it is... but that is my dream IH!
Wand works fine for me, but I'd upgrade for the smaller one if it worked like I said! I love the ritual of rolling a blunt or whatever but never liked using a torch on a vape, always felt weird and slightly embaressed to do it around others.. Probably just past experiences and that probably is just a me issue.
Yeah I only got the VM because it was with the Station, the Wand just didn't have the same fit and finish to me, so I'm more dedicated unit with timeout features and nice form etc would be really appealing...
You are so right about the stigma with the torch in general, so having that clean e experience makes sense, especially coming from battery powered herbal vapes etc...
After the initial launch of the Wand I thought I would like it for dabs, but I was more tempted when I got my olivewood WPA thermal accumulator, though it didn't feel right then again...
Tempest seems a bit more streamlined to work well with it though based on what you all are saying, so yeah okay I won't rule it out!!! Still will plan to start off with torch at least when time does come