All this talk of heat up time variances....without exact temperature monitoring and time control..... I'd say pointless, not to mention exact battery types and charge levels.... we're talking about time until vapor production right?, let's not forget about product moisture content also........
I'm not sure I'd call it pointless. Things which concern customers are seldom pointless.
As an owner, if my unit takes two or three times longer than the next guys for whatever reason I'm not happy. Even if it's not burning up my batteries faster, which I suspect it will be.
I don't think I agree about the exact temperature monitoring or time control either. Vaping temperature hasn't changed really, we're looking to get to 390 or so degrees to make serious vapor no matter how we get there, and if someone tells me it takes them 45 seconds to do so that's plenty exact enough to me to say it's a problem with others taking 20. That's a real, repeatable, difference most won't be happy with owning the 45 second version of. Human nature kinda stuff.
I agree other factors are involved, but I think the problem is real enough to not dismiss it as pointless. You can go broke insisting the customer is wrong.....
Time will tell if we're talking about a real problem worth worrying about, but to get there we'll need to look into it once the issue is raised. At least that's how I see it.
There is a large power difference, but not enough to explain a factor of three in time.
So if a 20% power cut lowers the temp linearly, it lessens the IR radiated by >60% ! The heat must still "get out", but conduction is simply slower than radiation.
Anyway, that's my guess
Once again, excellent thoughts. I agree, the power drop will come mostly from IR, I seriously doubt the temperature on the surface of the Hammer will drop much at all, available heat inside the bowl will (as seems to be the case).
This 'plays both ways'. If we lower the ability of the Hammer to 'throw off' the heat as IR (because we put a more insulating 'blanket' around it) that heat still has to go somewhere. I think the system will compensate by increasing the conduction transfer downward to the Persei. Not only isn't our precious battery power going to the load fast enough to make us happy sooner, but it's likely to be heating up the Persei and our batteries more in the process?
Fun stuff. I'll be harder to understand since a guy won't have a couple of differently performing Benders to compare side by side which would quickly sort out JPD's concerns I think? Does keep it from getting too dull.....
Thanks guys, food for thought......one of my favorite snacks.
OF