BuzzDanklin
Well-Known Member
I was told the heater was not modified, the performance should be identical to the one I have (maybe actually a bit better, due to the newer screen)
That's what I've been told and am hoping, Buzz. Your Hopper still holding up well?I was told the heater was not modified, the performance should be identical to the one I have (maybe actually a bit better, due to the newer screen)
But, you know, if they'd make the original heater design public, people could eventually print their own if they really wanted. Or even improved versions, if time and money were no object. Presumably, 3d printing technology will only improve over time, right?
If they did degrade the performance to meet production and cost constraints, I think they could at least give us that option.
Well, if it is patented, then nothing is stopping anyone from printing one for their own use, if they could obtain the model. They just couldn't sell it.Doubtful they would release the 3D models for the heater, it's most likely patented. That's not to say someone couldn't make something similar given some pictures or diagrams of how it works.
More than likely the problem with the heaters is related to the printing process. I'm betting it's a very challenging print, and probably harder to print than the manufacturer expected. (Printing 1 or 2 at a time is one thing, making 50 a week is another).
The PCB's on the other hand are a mystery (or whatever "electronics" could mean). Those should already be finished, unless there were some last-minute programming changes.
The PCB's on the other hand are a mystery (or whatever "electronics" could mean). Those should already be finished, unless there were some last-minute programming changes.
Seems to me there's a lot of masochism in this thread. A new conspiracy theory every day.
I'm a backer from November 2013, so I've been waiting longer than most of the people here. I'm not happy about it, but I'm not losing any sleep either. Worst case scenario is I'm out $129.00. Won't make me happy but it won't kill me.
Seems to me that Occam's Razor applies here. The simplest explanation is that the team are better engineers than business types and were wildly over-optimistic with their original shipping estimates. It's possible that they were deliberately over-optimistic to be sure that the original crowd funding effort was successful. Unless the updates are complete fiction, however, they seem to be working to overcome some unanticipated problems. If this was a total scam, or if they were willing to release a substandard product, I doubt it would have gone on this long, or that they would have put their names and faces on the Internet (I note that someone had checked them out and posted LinkedIn pages,etc. in the thread).
In any case, there is nothing I can do but wait. When I receive my unit, I'll post a review. Until then, I refuse to engage in self-flagellation. That's not my kink.
Right . . . obviously its not a scam, more of a misadventure of sorts IF things eventually turn out badly. I even posted earlier that I thought you guys would have functioning vapes and I still feel that one day you will. However this thread tasks me to think . . . outside the box . . . so-to-speak . . .At this stage it seems ridiculous to me that anyone would suggest that the Grasshopper is some kind of scam.
More than likely the problem with the heaters is related to the printing process. I'm betting it's a very challenging print, and probably harder to print than the manufacturer expected. (Printing 1 or 2 at a time is one thing, making 50 a week is another).
The PCB's on the other hand are a mystery (or whatever "electronics" could mean). Those should already be finished, unless there were some last-minute programming changes.
The thing that is hard to believe is they some how made it faster and cheaper to manufacture all with out changing the design.
@BuzzDanklin Any word on them changing the light patterns to indicate battery life? Many pages back, there was a great suggestion and consensus for an altered light pattern to show battery levels. And I think it's been enough time for them to make that change if they wanted to.
Occam's razor is whispering to me that someone who makes judgemental comments about kinks and people's choices may not be the most credible predictor of people's motives in general.