SmorezNTickles
It's real.
Trevor after every update:
...they did this to show us they're slowly closing in on the shipping date.
And the shipping date is getting real close now...really...it's getting close...no...really...Haven't they been "closing in on the shipping date" for over a year now?
technically yesHaven't they been "closing in on the shipping date" for over a year now?
By all means yes, but it's apparent that where they are now is a LEAP from where they were a year ago.Haven't they been "closing in on the shipping date" for over a year now?
And the shipping date is getting real close now...really...it's getting close...no...really...
Don't you think there will be some kind of stress-test/quality contrôle ? How long will that last ? I can't imagine them rushing after being so scrupulous for so looooooong. (with 7 ô)
I would conversely suggest that the GH team is funding our education. No one here is expert in what business vehicle they are driving, experiencing, and investing in. This is a learning experience for everyone concerned where no one holds a Ph. D.This is what I am fearing next. Some type of tolerance buildup issue where some parts won't fit with other parts and the yield gets really low.
I'm starting to realize that while I really like these guys and want them to succeed they are not the best at figuring out what obstacles might be in front of them. That I guess is why we are funding their education though.
I would conversely suggest that the GH team is funding our education. No one here is expert in what business vehicle they are driving, experiencing, and investing in. This is a learning experience for everyone concerned where no one holds a Ph. D.
My (40+ years in business) experience in general: Business people make poor engineers (with exceptions of course).I would reverse your converse to suggest that more than one of the issues GH is grappling with are covered in pretty basic business planning. I don't see their biggest problems as being technical (but those are there) or vape-specific, but business decisions that look kind of poorly executed. I think they should have brought in more straight business expertise. It feels to me like it's Steve Wozniak building computers in his garage, but needs a sharp Steve Jobs type to whip this into shape.
My experience: engineers make crappy businesspeople.
How about I rephrase it to "actually closing in?"Shipping date started at Feb 2014, and is now May 2015 at the earliest.
That's the opposite of "closing in"....
I would suggest for those unable to quell their hyper - impulsive unquenchable need for instant gratification that they manufacturer it themselves, from scratch. Walk a mile or a year in their shoes and then see if views change, not before.Sorry if it sounds like throwing stones, but promoting a product and missing the shipping date by a year seems to invite the what-happened question.
What I believe we can agree on @Snappo is that product performance is the most important. If it kicks ass, the box jokes will be long forgotten. But if there's performance problems, all the well wishes in the world won't help them.
Yes, it's speculative. I thought that's what Thread Candidates were about?
Edit: Not trying to be negative, but realistic. Remember, I'm a self-interested, biased consumer.
... who's joking about the boxes?!?!If it kicks ass, the box jokes will be long forgotten.
Fuck the pen, I want my box!!!... who's joking about the boxes?!?!
In some sort of Xeno's Paradox sense maybe...?How about I rephrase it to "actually closing in?"
Agreed, I've worked as a production artist for a couple decades, and when we're not on time for whatever reasons the mantra is "No one will remember it was late, as long as it's GOOD". This is a bit of an extreme case, I judge mostly due to poor perception management. I am wondering where in their schedule they put Quality Control - the backers and preorder's are the real beta program, but they must have a buncha tests for the parts as they come in, plus testing functionality on the other end of production...What I believe we can agree on @Snappo is that product performance is the most important. If it kicks ass, the box jokes will be long forgotten. But if there's performance problems, all the well wishes in the world won't help them.
Hi,I would suggest for those unable to quell their hyper - impulsive unquenchable need for instant gratification that they manufacturer it themselves, from scratch. Walk a mile or a year in their shoes and then see if views change, not before.
That's the mystery, why feel obligated to present things differently than they are... in that vague way that feels familiar now. Like when, after the update on the 15th, Dirt asked Trevor "will you guys be ready to start assembly as soon as the shipment is in?" and he responded "We will be ready to assemble as soon as we have all the parts." ?? It's kinda the most positive version of the answer w/o actually being an answer - at the time, I read it as "the shipment on the 22nd is not ALL the parts" which they did confirm later in another personal email, but no transparency points for the Grasshopper Team. It's an interesting style.But why are they obliged to not tell us the whole truth ?