steiner666 said:
I've seen dozens of people use both my dbv and ssv, and the lighter base and horizontal heatercover/wand design of the dbv always causes people to have issues with herb getting dumped or blown into the heatercover
I had no problem with the lighter weight, smaller footprint, or blow back into the HC, but it does require a lighter touch than the SSV. Judging by the number of DBV owners I've seen post on multiple forums though, I'd say these complaints are far fewer, percentage wise, than your sample, and mainly evident when the user has access to both vapes at the same time. The contrast is much more evident when you can A/B compare.
cluffy said:
[DBV]It's lighter, smaller and easier to handle.
Wasn't lightweight just listed as a downside to the DBV?
the SSV I suppose is the better vape as far as efficiency goes
As far as functional differences between the two, I don't think efficiency qualifies. The only significant difference in the way they process or hit is the difference between heater covers, making the air stream different diameters, and that results in a difference, but it's not a 'one's better than the other' difference. They both use the same heater and electronics.
2clicker said:
as for the richness of the vapor between the units... not sure what to say. i can say that my DBV produces extremely rich vapor hits. equivalent to big bong hits. i dont see how anyone would need or even want a more rich hit of vapor than what the DBV can provide.
Quite a few people do. Personally, sometimes I do and sometimes I don't. Some like a bigger hit than either of these models can supply. Some much prefer silicone tubing to the supplied tubing. Some want no tubing in the vapor path at all-glass all the way. With an A/B comparison, it's obvious there's a difference in vapor/air ratio between the two. It's minor, but it's there. And to some it's an important difference. My wife can't imagine wanting a bigger hit than she gets with a log vape. But what does that have to do with anyone else's preference?
Vayu said:
SSV > DBV due to downward slanted standard glass heater cover and ability to customize.
These differences don't necessarily make the SSV better. They're just ergonomics and eye candy. Some don't care about the SSV HC angle, or care to customize it.
SSV's are assembled in house while the DBV's are put togethor in China.
So what's your theory about why a DBV is inferior to one that was assembled in the US? Is non US labor automatically less capable? If the parts are the same, and they are, why does it matter WHERE something is put together? What matters, to the manufacturer, is getting the same quality at a lower cost, whenever possible. It makes sense to get the DBV assembled with cheaper labor, since they're all the same. The different options you get with the SSV make that model a lot less practical for overseas assembly. The new assembly location for the DBV has been a total non-issue to this point.
All of these differences are just that-differences. They should be taken into consideration or not, depending on whether the individual buyer considers them important. They are reasons why a person may prefer X to Y, not why X is better than Y.