Hi again Razor,
Oh yes, indeed. I, for one, find that most appropriate, on the contrary. Anyway just a few posts back i noticed that more feedback was announced, is it not?
Or is that a bad mood day? I'd find capitulation somewhat premature, don't we agree?
More questions keep popping up on my side, as for my private correspondance with Loto Labs it was interrupted years ago for reasons i have no right to reveal in public since it's private mail, exactly. My only concern is inherited from topics which were hardly debated in 2010 when i wrote about induction heat for the 1st time on FC, weeks if not days after i registered, as i recall.
Now, i'm getting worried!
How would one ever assume i'm here for Loto Labs given the written context?? Or is this intended as censorship?... Or just basically getting personal?? After "briefing" via PM in the background i guess?...
Don't worry as those are only questions.
Indeed, that's what i'm here for. To receive this valuable input from a 1st-person perspective - and it's clear i do have more thoughts of my own to express, if you don't mind.
It's a feat to find we agree at least on the last point about the importance of sharing the fun, though i can't seem to feel your enthousiams. Maybe tomorrow will be a better day, do not despair...
While i'm around i'd like to add some perspective of my own, the workload to begin with:
This is shreaded dry-flower material and here's what's the vaporist challenge alike, as far as i'm concerned. It's about how are we supposed to maximize energy transfer to trichome glands while minimizing dispersion to surrounding vegetal substrate... Motivation to do so is potential access to the most "bio" cannabic workload that pro-cannabic consumers can possibly dream of:
the shortest path of least transformation!
Imagine your favourite dry cannabis being sorted on a molecular basis, at a scale where some vesicles located at the base of each trichome gland take an active part to their genesis, in situ! That's way beyond ape-age "filltration" and all its unnecessary manipulations. Consider how pure the "sugar" shall prove to be when perfectly cured, using true "bio". YMMV but that should be quite a treat IMHO.
In any case that's a mission requiring an energy source with some more puch and yet not necessarily an energy budget to waste as futile heat losses, vegetal substrate baking for example, etc.
Too bad but i don't need or feel like contacting Loto Labs in hope this may help to understand the severe trade-offs endorsed by that particularily mute manufacturer, starting with conduction mode - and that's no "speculation". Loto Labs proved it could talk for itself.
About a "pumping" action i suppose it's worth a try, but when it comes to "pulse" mode i've got something radically different in mind which i've tagged "Packetized" and "Micro-Bursting", among other aspects... Packetized in the sense of "quanta", which means the overall heat charge is divided in smaller packets (or bursts) that can be handled within all heat-tolerance ranges by taking advantage of delay barriers preventing instantaneous heat diffusion (e.g. relatively slow thermalization). As for "Bursting" it's about doing more with less, or « Divide to Conquer »...
Take note how large the shreaded vegetal tissue happens to be compared to a single crystalized trichome gland... Is that not an opportunity hardly compatible with slow conduction heat?...
Alternately, does the Loto Labs handy IH generator absolutely exclude future conversions to a mix of radiative/convective heat, eventually? Sorry to bring it back, 'cause i'm afraid if the manufacturer failed to explore such stimulating matters successfully in a matter of years then what's the point hoping for a change of attitude after a few months?... Sounds like "wishful thinking" to me, YMMV.
Nothing personal, those are questions i could have asked in 2010, when i wondered myself. No review to expect from me, or is it mandatory to post in this pioneer IH-dedicated thread??
One way or another i still got to ask if energy bursts can be generated that match workload requirements as illustrated above. E. G. melt the goodies starting with their contact-surface 1st, no need to bake everything.
I'm convinced Electro-Magnetic Induction Heat supports these options, it's a matter of trade-offs as you've demonstrated yourself.
Good day, have fun!!