herbivore21
Well-Known Member
Sapphire is certainly and very commonly known (as well as clearly explained by any synthetic optics manufacturer who produces both materials - there are a small number that I know of whose sites can be readily found on google) to have better thermal conductivity than fused quartz. It is not necessarily a better thermal conductor than SiC. There may be some other explanation or mechanism for how it tastes better. I do not know of any literature even remotely approaching a clear and specific answer to this question though.Ok so for a long time now ai have been aware that thos is the most common generalized conception held by advocates of using the specialized advanced materials for you heat transfering surface when dabbing. And I will not argue that as an owner of both tbe SiC insert and the quartz I can from personal experience say that yes SiC is superior to quartz. BUT THIS is easily explained BY SiC being a bettef thermal conductor as pure Silica Glass which is refeed to as fused quartz is just simply a poor thermal conductor and does transfer the heat well enough to evenly disperse it throughout the material creating a hotter and colder portions of the materail. While SiC will tend to have a evenly heated surface due to it high rate of thermal tranfer allowing greater heat dispersion.
Now in regards oomparing the use of SiC vs Sapphire use a a heat transfering surface to dab off of I have not heard the plaind factual explaination as to what phyiscal characteristics of saphire make it better than SiC as a heat transfer surface And how . Can someone explain why saphire is more desirable other than its spendy which is always trendy.
What we do know is that almost, if not everyone (both around here and elsewhere) who has ever dabbed on sapphire swears that it was the tastiest thing they ever dabbed on. Even those who didn't pay for it. Even those who just used a buddy's one or something. There are so many reports here raving about how nice sapphire tastes to dab on from those who have tried. Of course, there are some sad stories of cracked sapphire too - it definitely can happen - SiC is undoubtedly more durable and I've always maintained this from day 1.
Have you used sapphire for dabs yet? As they say, seeing (or in this case, dabbing) is believing. I think for you this will be the best way to put this question to bed (IIRC you haven't dabbed on sapphire yet? Correct me if I'm wrong of course!).
As soon as I know the specific explanation for the physical/chemical mechanisms by which sapphire beats SiC in the flavor stakes, I'll be sure to let you and everyone here know. At least for now though, this is a very niche question for the scientific literature though man and as someone very familiar with this stuff, I can tell you I don't know of a place on earth where the funding will be forthcoming to launch independent scientific studies into why (unless they were from the vape industry, in which case we stoners would all cry shill lol) sapphire makes for tastier dabs than silicone carbide
All we can do at the moment is look at the information that is out there comparing thermal conductivity (all I've seen so far relates to comparisons between sapphire and quartz, but there may be information comparing sapphire and SiC - I do not presume to have read all such literature!), any other possible relevant factors and otherwise just take notice of the fact that most everyone who has ever used (let alone owned) a sapphire nail has recognized that it stands alone as the tastiest thing to dab on - and that the number of those who do is a lot greater now than it was when I first said that sapphire is the tastiest thing so far.
Also this very clearly isn't just a 'spendy=trendy' thing.
Where's the same universal praise for the massive flavor benefits of the much more expensive pukinbeagle quartz designs that are out there? Surely if $$$$$ = popularity, these super expensive quartz designs would be the 'trendiest' nail on the block?
Last edited: