Terpenetime
Well-Known Member
But you'll want to make sure you have room between the clip and body before starting.
Surely you’d just unscrew the backend before applying it?
But you'll want to make sure you have room between the clip and body before starting.
Surely you’d just unscrew the backend before applying it?
Maybe try this before epoxy which may be very hard to remove if you wish to later
https://www.homedepot.com/p/Plasti-Dip-14-5-oz-Black-Plastic-Dip-11603-6/202196703
I've used this stuff for tool handles and the like....works great.
Can't you just bend the clip out a bit so it does not rub to start with?
Yeah, same. I've always wanted a deep blue or green Ti hopper, but went with a secondhand SS one instead. Maybe a Ti Hopper IO is in my future?Once everything is in stock, batteries and all stuff sorted and I hear some good feedback on here I will look at purchasing this device. as it has always interested me (a working one anyway)
Yeah I can say you have me interested. I missed the first preorder of io. I also called it an iou and you will have to deliver on these promises! But I will be grabbing one when released. Will the list be opened up again for preorders (site launching) soon I know you gave a date 4-20 so I'm hoping that deadline will be met. And will pfe fit the ioHere is the first set of improvements explained.
Front-end:
• New Process and Tooling for Screen Threaded Assembly.
This change makes the screen assembly tighter which translates to a much lower chance that the screen comes unscrewed accidentally. I know some people purposefully take this screen out, which you could still do but our goal was to eliminate it accidentally coming out from the factory.
• Internal pathway tweak for slight cooling improvement
Small geometry changes to the FE assembly which gives a little more of an air gap inside. The simulation shows a small improvement and it all adds up.
• Better threading mesh on Screen Assembly, less waste during production
Mostly an internal tweak but for those who do take the screen out you should be able to thread it back in easier than before.
Body:
• New interface between Chamber Assembly and Body
• Added copper strip overlay into the threading
Both of these items address a critical power transfer point that had the potential in the Grasshopper to cause loss. There is an assembly interface to make the device possible to build at the chamber/body joint. The power must flow through this area and over time the electrical resistance of this interface could increase. With io it was a major goal to eliminate/midgate all of these possible loss points, to increase power delivery and battery life.
• Added Laser welding to PCB support to body interface
Similar to the above but at this interface, we were able to make a laser weld to do the job. Laser welding is a great technology that allows pinpoint welds to be made without adding material. The weld creates a permanent low resistance electrical pathway.
• Switched to new machine handled PCB to PCB support solder interface
Switching to machine handled soldering here means tighter control of the process and also more time for QC. One of the recent improvements to the assembly process has been the introduction of low-cost cameras that take pictures of an assembly to 1. To build closed-loop feedback systems for automation and 2. To allow the computer to compare images of the correct outcome to those it is completing now and flag any anomalies for a human to review.
Thissss. This is the info I've been WAITING for!@Hopper Labs did tell me that I could leave the warranty unfulfilled and upgrade it sometime towards an io, but that HL has not set the policy or terms for that sort of thing yet.
Thissss. This is the info I've been WAITING for!
This is what I was saying last page. I’m curious if this will be a general agreement with HL or on a case-by-case basis with individuals. I however do not have a non-working unit - just curious...That’s a great idea! Not that I have a second unit or lost anything in the fire (sorry about yours and everyones’ losses there). Was this something HL publicly said could be done with lost fire devices? Definitely a good remediation option if yo
I would make the same decision at this point, about not taking the credit offered. I haven't pre-ordered an io.I asked about skipping my repair and using it towards credit for the IO. They offered $80 credit so I think I'll just wait for repair and pay full price for my reserved IO.
Yeah, that's one of the reasons why when I first heard of the IO, I was kind of "Hmm." about the whole thing. Because, sure, the improvements warrant calling it a whole new hopper. But given that the Hopper OG wasn't completely functional for several years and there are people with over a year of RMA, or who have had their hopper in RMA longer than in their hands, it feels almost... insulting. The hopper didn't need an improvement, it needed an overhaul. It felt like it was still in Beta for a long time, so throwing $100+ dollars on the current price tag and relying on promises that have been unfulfilled before feels... sketchy, at best.Buying an io at $80 discount means $175 net for a SS io - which is a lot more than I paid for any of the current Hoppers I own. And guess what, we have no track record at all on this one, just a whole lot of rear view mirror.
The big question (for me) will be, For just how long is HL going to market and support the og Grasshopper? This is not a question for which I'm expecting an answer...
Has your unit been RMA’d? Mine was and it’s like having a new vape - and reliable working Hopper - again. Just saying. I think they got the internals all figured out and stable - but it did take a few years. And they claimed the RMA backlog was significantly reduced however that is subjective at best: my RMA took a year almost to the day and I got it back 7 weeks before the fire.I do enjoy my hopper. I just wish it was as reliable, stable, and usable as I want it to be. And I wish I could look forward to the IO with optimism and excitement.
I don't. Mine has been RMA'd twice since they supposedly got it all figured out and it is currently sitting at Hopper Labs. Still extremely excited for the IO though I think it will be incredible.I think they got the internals all figured out and stable
Sorry you’re still having issues. Were the RMAs quick or long? I had sensed there were fewer problems but not in your case. Quality control was a big issue early on and it seemed it was getting better. But not of course from your point of viewI don't. Mine has been RMA'd twice since they supposedly got it all figured out and it is currently sitting at Hopper Labs. Still extremely excited for the IO though I think it will be incredible.
Not yet! Was waiting until their backlog was a bit lower, but then the fire happened. Mine works, it just runs a bit cool (and I have no batteries), so I'm hesitant to send it in and have no convection vape for an undetermined amount of time. Hoping to see where they are a bit after the IO launches. Cause, man, I really do love my Hopper... when it works.Has your unit been RMA’d? Mine was and it’s like having a new vape - and reliable working Hopper - again. Just saying.