vapormachina
Well-Known Member
wow! I take my hat off to you guys
it's all clear, take my money now!!
it's all clear, take my money now!!
Last edited:
This it true. I haven't thought through the concept as it was originally concepted by @phattpiggie but that might be because remote switches were rare outside of DIY. DIY sip'd and dip'd alike with the added reach for the power button. Having a remote switch is an extra action. 2 hands however is not required. I have dropped the CV in the chamber to reach for the button so in the case of having the heater parked, one handed is still simple. If I'm holding the heater anyway, it is a two handed operation already. I fire with the hand holding the VC or I fire with the hand holding the heater. The very elegance of Vapcaps is the ability to separate the works from the engine.Is not also one of the differences from the switch and the cap as switch, that the first one need both hands and on the cap as switch only one hand. Taking the vapcap and dip it in the chamber and the heating begins vs take the vapcap put it in the chamber and then push the button to begin heating? For me this is a big advantage from the cap as switch the one handed operation when the heater is set down on the table or so.
If you need some help just send me the parts and I'll start cranking some out for ya lolYou're killing me, Tommy, lol. I AM THE BOTTLENECK! Having more distributors only helps if I can crank out more heaters.
Updated to add: Tomy's post above mine is FANTASTIC (!!!) and I strongly endorse it! His notes on battery capacity and Flite power usage are definitive. This man KNOWS that of which he speaks.
OK, now I'm off to edit video...
interesting! can anyone else weigh in? this is what i'm deciding betweenI prefer the tip activated over the push button on my Flix. I can feel the click better than I can hear it most of the time.
To me, the only advantage of the button is that your able to hit it while heating. Hard to do when you are pushing the switch in the camber or using the cap as switch option. So if you'd like the option to try out heating while ripping go with the button. Also with the button like Tommy said you can drop some cork in there to raise the depth to adjust the heating time. If you dont care for all the experimenting with cap placement and heating times and just want to hit it I'd stick with cap as switch. Long story short the button give your more options as to how you go about heating and hitting your bowl. Cap as switch is just simple and to the point. Drop it in and wait for the click. I guess you can play with the PWM for either as well so there's that also. I'm gonna go with cap as switch personally.interesting! can anyone else weigh in? this is what i'm deciding between
the only advantage of the button is that your able to hit it while heating.
Jeff chose a particularly nice switch for remote activation. Its plastic button pushes nearly flush with the bezel when activated. This would require purposeful activation in a pocket. An empty jacket pocket or alike will not allow the switch to activate. Sitting on it might.Where the cap as switch could still be beneficial is that is no must to turn the heater complete off while put in a pocket, because he can not get accidently activated in contrast to the switch activation.
Jeff chose a particularly nice switch for remote activation. Its plastic button pushes nearly flush with the bezel when activated. This would require purposeful activation in a pocket. An empty jacket pocket or alike will not allow the switch to activate. Sitting on it might.
Of course, the off-switch is there for all the right reasons. If there is a chance something pushes the button with purpose in or through your clothing, it will activate the heater. These things do demand a reasonable level of respect. I think you'll like the switch Jeff choose for this function with these considerations in mind.
Same here1am here, I won't go to bed until I have my Flite. Luckily it's friday