weedandbombs
Vape Queen! :D
though I should say, I think ACE OF VAPES needs to apologize as well for his comment... *ahem*
Don't let it get to you Linda. I'm sure it's nothing personal. And feel free to post away here. As long as you go by our rules you won't have any problems. If you do, just let us know, and we'll get things (or the appropriate poster) straightened out.BTW Andrew promised me an EpicVape back in September and I never saw it. :/ I keep having that issue with pretty much anyone who has asked me to review a vaporizer over the last six months or so. It's starting to depress me!
Hey guys, I did a quick search of this forum and didn't see too munch info (probably because people are just getting their E-Nano's now).
For those who have received one, what would you say is the E-Nano's best feature in comparison to other log vapes (or vapes in general).
Does the Nano produce higher temps than over Log vapes because of the dial?
Hey guys, I did a quick search of this forum and didn't see too munch info (probably because people are just getting their E-Nano's now).
For those who have received one, what would you say is the E-Nano's best feature in comparison to other log vapes (or vapes in general).
I agree. Temperature control and standard 120 A/C are my favourite features.Temp control, without a doubt. I usually use up to 5 1/2 on the dial during the day and up to 7 1/2 at night. The higher temps work great for concentrates as well. I've been using quite a bit of full melt with my Nano and it lasts forever.
It produces more varied temps out of the box than other log vapes.Does the Nano produce higher temps than over Log vapes because of the dial?
The only other log I've used is the UD, but the Nano blows it out of the water IMO. I can't imagine any other log vape being better. After the VXC I'd rank the Nano as the clearcut #2 for desktops in my book.
though I should say, I think ACE OF VAPES needs to apologize as well for his comment... *ahem*
Not to take anything away from the nano, but I have a nano, a couple UDs and a HI, I don't think any of them blows the other out of the water. They all have different characteristics but I can get huge clouds out of any of them with the proper grind/load/technique. If you are not using a VVPS then I can see how someone might think this is the case.
The only other log I've used is the UD, but the Nano blows it out of the water IMO. I can't imagine any other log vape being better. After the VXC I'd rank the Nano as the clearcut #2 for desktops in my book.
Yes, you can use a VVPS on any log and get variable temp. But the Nano comes stock with temp control and that's one of it's biggest, if not the biggest, selling points. So as far as making a single vape purchase ready to go on arrival, I think its safe to say that the Nano is better than the UD. Sure, though, with mods and extras you can make several vapes just as good as the next one.
"lack power" is not the best way to put it. Every vape gets the 'power' it requires to operate the way it was designed. As for "thick" hits, around here we usually use the term to refer to hits that are dense, as in a high vapor to air ratio. With a restricted air flow due to a small bowl and a short, narrow vapor path, log vapes like the extinct Purple Days and Aromazap do provide thick, vapor dense hits. They're just not big hits. What you probably mean by "thick vapour hits" is high temp vapor, which is thick and harsh. That kind of hit is now available with some models. The Aromazap (CRZ) was available at the end of its run with an optional variable voltage supply (I use the Hildbrandt Spartan). With Alan's HI (Heat Island), you can get the VV supply in analog form, and the in-line analog dial control on the Nano is the easiest/simplest to use. The Nano's optional all glass wand (the way to go IMO), even with an added 3/8" screen (also the way to go with this piece IMO), allows for much bigger hits than the older and narrower tubes designed for the older log designs. So even though the hits are less dense, due to the free flowing air path, you can fill your lungs with more vapor, in one long hit, and at the temp you choose. The hits can approach those you get with a full sized whip model.Huh. This is interesting. The only issue I've ever had with logs is sometimes they lack power to really get the thick vapour hits. I love everything else about logs though so this may be perfect.
The E-nano is only similar in form factor and stem style. It has completely different heating element. The Nano uses a 120v ceramic cartridge. All other 'log vapes' use a 12v resistor.Not to mention the fact they pretty much all use the same internal parts, perhaps different heatport shapes and voltages but that's about it.
I'm not denying the nano is an amazing log vape. What i'm saying is that your suggestions is based upon very subjective reasoning. It's fine that you think a built-in vvps is worth its weight in gold, but honestly different consumers have different needs. I'm just suggesting you stay away from the words emphasized in the quotations.
On my way to fed-ex to pick up some heaters I hope...