Mr. Me2
Well-Known Member
Where does he get all those wonderful toys?...On the road again:
Where does he get all those wonderful toys?...On the road again:
Where does he get all those wonderful toys?...
This wouldn't be too hard for me to do. I already drill a 10mm hole through the wood.That would definitely work but what I actually want is another @phattpiggie stem based on an 8mm SS tube with the WonG joint overlapping the Omni MP by about 65%.
I know it's a lot more money/effort than a silicone adapter but I have a feeling I'm gonna be using this setup for years to come.
I haven't mentioned it to Phatt's yet and don't know if it's possible or if he is even willing to do a stem like this. Also I only decided I wanted this after is latest list was closed so I'll have to wait for the next list, but I'm in no rush.
EDIT: forgot to draw the carb hole but obviously that would be required for the Omni variable air flow system to work.
I haven't mentioned it to Phatt's yet
That would definitely work but what I actually want is another @phattpiggie stem based on an 8mm SS tube with the WonG joint overlapping the Omni MP by about 65%.
This wouldn't be too hard for me to do. I already drill a 10mm hole through the wood.
You have now, Blackwood against the Ti would look nice but in any wood the joint is going to have to be changed so the final part of the taper isn't such a thin wall.
I like the idea of an all metal version but I've not got a metal lathe, yet. And the taper could be done as you've drawn it.
If the feeding frenzy has tailed off a bit perhaps there could be a chance @VapCap could get a metal one done.
Or if he hadn't beaten me to it, I was going to suggest @Winegums would be the man.
Just to add to the wood and toxicity things, as @WoodVillain suggested try looking in The Wood Database.
I have said to customers if they are at all susceptible to anything then they should be cautious, it's normally dust and saps that are going to cause problems but it wouldn't do any harm to do a bit of research.
If you are at all worried then avoid the species that could cause concern, I'm sure most properly dried wood coated in a wax would be okay but I would hate for anyone to go all Nutty Professor.
http://i.imgur.com/8Bp7HPH.png
And what does shot gun it mean in the following context?
"I usually draw covering the carb hole at first till I feel smoke then shot gun it." He's not blowing into someone else's mouth which is the meaning of shot gun.
@SummerI have heard the term shotgun also refered to as taking your finger off the carb.
Actually your stem is what my Omni condenser is currently sitting in. That should work Blackwood ends, maybe some of that dear antler you once mentioned in the middle
WonG = Wood on Glass, as in a wood stem on a glass joint. The wood has a stainless steel core running through it.
On the lid of the green tube it says cooljarz . com...
I have heard the term shotgun also refered to as taking your finger off the carb.
@VisiblyVaped - the adjustable ratio is only applicable if you use the carb. For hardest hitting vapor cover the carb.That's beautiful. You made it? Also, that's a ti omni correct?
Have you had an M or a nanovong just to give direct pros and cons real quick.
I'm right on the fence. I have both of the mentioned and love em. The adjustable ratio REALLY intrigued me.
Oiy, GrassHopper, now you've got to choose between 2 artisans.
So am I right in saying 'a vong as in nonavong but it a wong because it's a wood stem on a glass joint?' I know that the wood has ss running through it as I've seen @Winegums pics. But I don't get what you mean by glass joint. You've got the tip & the ss lined, wood stem so why glass anything? I need to be educated.
Am I correct in that Dynavap doesn't line there nonavongs w/ ss?
Am I correct in that Dynavap doesn't line there nonavongs w/ ss?
@GreenHopper, we know how your good diagram skills are, want to devle into the world of polls. I didn't think so.
...or better PonG (plastic on glass)... a more open term (could be bakelite or such else too)
wo’ batlhvaD (For the honor of the Empire!)
klingon blue glass vapcap stand
nah...i don't have a heater from pipes yet...and I feel like an asshole for it
And orientation....i think I like the carb more open when I'm up and moving as opposed to a more restricted draw when I'm sitting back or laying down sipping on it.
I also like the ability to load it and draw while I adjust to find that sweet spot...which is handy when the condenser starts to get dirty and the draw isn't quite the same.
.... Now, what I want to know: Having only done minimal reading on the subject, the consensus seems to be that the trichomes (sp.) act immediately, there's no need to hold the toke; in fact, it's less healthy for your lungs, but, I don't know if it's habit, or the innate, joint-smoking mentality that you get higher, or that I just like holding it in; which I do. Anyway, is it preference or is it just plain wrong when vaping? Interested in what you guys think. ...
Great information, perspective and tips as always! Just to add a thought- a very crucial factor regarding absorption of actives is where exactly the actives, and vapor, are.LOVE this thing. Great work! Now need to find something like this to do the same with.
You need to get a Pipes heater. Not just because it will be great for you, but I'm dying to see your vid review of it!
There is much discussion on this all over FC since inception. Also, a few complete threads (I added a few links in below). Don't think there has ever been total consensus (in threads at least), with much squabbling back and forth whether holding hit in is worth it or not.
I've come to the conclusion that seems what most thinking and experimenting people have come to... Effects from trichromes (or more accurately here THC) and other actives you're vaping are absorbed pretty quickly, though effects on brain and body can take a few minutes to set in. But, your lungs need fresh air (the oxygen? seems to be what most think) to mix with vapor for absorption. I think this is because your lungs probably aren't going to absorb vapor itself, we kind of trick them into doing so with mix of fresh air.
Once all of the fresh air is absorbed, your lungs stop absorbing, so any vapor left will just sit there until exhale, then be blown out. You will add to your buzz by holding it in, but IMO this is just oxygen depletion - same as holding your breath too long - enhanced a small bit by vapor being present.
IME to get the most out of your vapor, re-breathe (several other terms for it). Hit your VC (or preferred vape) and hold the hit for 5 - 10 seconds. Then breathe out a bit (1/3 of what's in lungs? This is my amount, but whatever you're comfortable with), and inhale some fresh air. As your lungs absorb this fresh air/oxygen they will also absorb some of that vapor still left in your lungs. Do the same as much as you like until no visible vapor being exhaled. I usually only do 2 - 3 re-breaths at most.
Again, a lot of loose theory here and not much scientific data I'm aware of to back it up, but it works amazingly well!! It may take a few tries to get it down, but isn't too difficult. If like most, you'll probably find you get twice as buzzed from same number of hits/loads - or just as buzzed with half as many hits/loads. Great for conservation - especially when stash is low and "that guy" isn't replying to calls/texts, if you're short on time or in a situation where trying to be discrete and want to get there quickly and not re-load too much.
This works great with VCs and every other vape I've tried it with. Give it a whirl and let us know what you think. OR, maybe a new thread (specific to VC?) on this may be even better?
EDIT: Think there are even more than these, but here are a few threads that explore holding hits in. Think I kept them in chronological order of when thread was started.
http://fuckcombustion.com/threads/holding-your-draw-toke.185/
http://fuckcombustion.com/threads/holding-in-your-hits.14539/
http://fuckcombustion.com/threads/holding-hits-in-diy-experiment.1590/
http://fuckcombustion.com/threads/vapor-recycling-breathing-technique.16857
http://fuckcombustion.com/threads/are-clouds-of-vapor-counterproductive.18198/
http://fuckcombustion.com/threads/how-to-get-the-best-hits-from-your-vaporizer.18270/
Great information, perspective and tips as always! Just to add a thought- a very crucial factor regarding absorption of actives is where exactly the actives, and vapor, are.
It wants to be inside the actual lungsl all that is still queuing up in the throat to get into the football stadium is not going to be absorbed. So your actual inhalation technique, specifically how deep you get the vapor, whether you get all of it into your lungs and how long you are then able to keep it there comes into play.
It helps if you can finish your hit, whatever size, and then continue to inhale. I know you know all this Flotntoke and a TON more than me about all things vapes I am sure.
My lungs are large though and despite my crazy allergy and respiratory problems, I have excellent breath control and technique for vaping. So I can usually get the whole hit deep down into my lungs and hold it there. There is no question there is a significantly stronger effect for me to hold the vapor for 5 to 10 seconds, or even longer, then to exhale after less than 5 seconds.
I have had to ration and conserve my weed supply for years, and have always observed an unquestionable correlation - whenever I stopped holding my hits in for as long, I would go through twice as much weed and not get nearly as buzzed.
The re breathing technique is an excellent method for increasing absorption in a more comfortable and surely healthier manner. I realise I probably do this unconsciously when I vape to generally get the most effect. Consciously, I always just make sure to get the hit deep down into my lungs and hold it there for at least a few seconds, normally 5 to 10, and then do some comfortable re-breathing.
If weed supply was unlimited, I would exhale sooner for pleasure sake. Managing my allergies 24/7 entails deep essential oil inhalation, holding in. If I dont get the essential oil I inhale deep enough into my lungs, and/or dont hold it in (really the most crucial bit, but a bit like the chicken and the egg!) l then the result, and level of relief I get, is just a pittance compared to inhaling deep and holding for 10 seconds plus.
Totally different things. Im not trying to absorb peppermint oil, I want the menthol to be in longer contact with the mucus that fills my lungs from allergies and infections.
But somehow they share a principle in a roundabout way.
I do think it is possible however to get a very high level of absorption from the initial inhale, if deep enough and held down for 10 secs or so. As long as you take a lungful of air in with it there should be enough oxygen etc for the process. Just not the most pleasant way t9 go throught the day though. Also is in fact on the exhale that I really notice the flavour of the weed, if I dont hold it too long. The longer I hold my hits, the less I notice any flavour on the exhale, not to mention that the exhale is significantly smaller and less visible from a 7 to 10 second hold.
Does this suggest that more terpenes and probably other molecules continue to be absorbed with a longer inhale, but still fairly rapidly?
I only noticed this just recently after a fresh harvest of nice medicine, which should see me through the next 12 months at least without thought of ration.
So I have been exhaling sooner so as not to discomfort myself, and wow have I been noticing the flavour so much more than with a longer hold!