I don't really see the point to that one...Im disappointed having to wait on the Torus.
For in the mean time thinking about grabbing this one.
Surprised much hasn't been said about it. Not many have been purchased either
I don't really see the point to that one...
It's a knockoff of the clear matrix (which is my favourite piece of glass ever), but it's small like an ion - so there's nothing different about it and the gb-187, aside from the gb-187 having a better base...
When I told steven about it the response was basically "but people want small items - can you give better measurements"
The FC-1000 is one of the largest items steven has produced, and has received some of the most universally positive feedback... Smh...
---------------------
There seems to be a lot less collaboration happening with pieces now within FC...
Someone sees something they like, tells steven, then tells us that they've told steven - no brainstorming ideas for improvements or anything, like the binary matrix...
I really, really wanted the binary matrix, but in trying to emulate the original they made the stem crazy far away from the can and 14mm...
I thought the general consensus was that most of us prefer 18mm joints, unless the piece is small enough that a smaller joint is needed...
Now I'm just stuck waiting for a v2 with the necessary changes...
And I think that a few members are in the same boat?
I saw a LOT of interest in that binary matrix, then it came out less than stellar, and everyone is holding off...
I might be way off, but I feel like I've been noticing this trend more and more over the last few months...
Fair point, I wasn't considering units sold (I have honestly never checked that as far as I can remember), but more the general reception of the piece here on FC...@Frederick McGuire I basically agree with everything in your post except to point out that the units sold on the fc1000 isn't that spectacular and most of the best selling pieces are on the small end. Just compare to the straight fab which is newer/more expensive yet has more sold.
I don't really see the point to that one...
It's a knockoff of the clear matrix (which is my favourite piece of glass ever), but it's small like an ion - so there's nothing different about it and the gb-187, aside from the gb-187 having a better base...
When I told steven about it the response was basically "but people want small items - can you give better measurements"
The FC-1000 is one of the largest items steven has produced, and has received some of the most universally positive feedback... Smh...
---------------------
There seems to be a lot less collaboration happening with pieces now within FC...
Someone sees something they like, tells steven, then tells us that they've told steven - no brainstorming ideas for improvements or anything, like the binary matrix...
I really, really wanted the binary matrix, but in trying to emulate the original they made the stem crazy far away from the can and 14mm...
I thought the general consensus was that most of us prefer 18mm joints, unless the piece is small enough that a smaller joint is needed...
Now I'm just stuck waiting for a v2 with the necessary changes...
And I think that a few members are in the same boat?
I saw a LOT of interest in that binary matrix, then it came out less than stellar, and everyone is holding off...
I might be way off, but I feel like I've been noticing this trend more and more over the last few months...
I just got my binary matrix today... Very meh, the function is not as good as the one in the video. The joint support's little disc is not straight, but kind of rotated. The neck is not lined up to the can/joint. Bubbles in the glass. Overall kind of disappointed vs the straight fab and Torus quality. Maybe Steven had the B squad do this one? lol Maybe we need to hold off for V2
Im disappointed having to wait on the Torus.
For in the mean time thinking about grabbing this one.
Surprised much hasn't been said about it. Not many have been purchased either
woke up this morning and saw this video posted on Steven's YouTube page...Ah damn thanks.. I was thinking it was an exact clear matrix clone. Not conceding anymore haha
I agree with your next statement. Some of these pieces could totally avoid having 2nd and 3rd versions. (That could save sellers some money with all those left over v1s) this could go for the Torus issue. Im hooked a buying a Torus clone, but with the vortex not functioning as well as it should I'm stuck either waiting on the perfected version to release who knows when or buying the decent version now.. Im not sure how many exact versions he has released but Stevens got multiple Torus youtube videos posted..
The binary matrix would be a whole lot better with the improvements you mentioned. As I'm also a user that was waiting on the v2 but I'm assuming it might be a while so I'm probably gonna go ahead and pull the trigger. The joint distance doesn't bother me at all, just the strength of the 14mm because it does look fragile as fuck.. im assuming he made it this way to try and exactly clone the official Mobius version (or because he didnt know how to improve it lol)
Edit: just ordered my first worked rig. Mini beaker. Fucking finally. Im 3 ready to kick back in the recliner and do some super comfy dabs!
And can someone please tell me the negatives to the Torus vortex being a little slow. My geekness for glass is acting up..
Since the straight fab is a top seller and it was just brought up. Can someone give me an explanation of the hit on it? My main concern is the splash back. Do you have to control your inhale speed at all? Also whats the drag on it compared to?
Quick question, I've been looking at Stevens version of the Mobius Matrix and its very similar to the d20 but considerably more expensive. Is there a justifiable difference between the two that warrants buying his Matrix over a normal d20 for $30 less?
Thanks!I have both, and IMO YES - definitely. First, the one you posted a pic of is the sidecar model. I prefer this with my normal daily driver - the e-nano - and would with any vape you put directly on the bubb. Sidecar is nice to keep the vape off to the side instead of right in your face and allows you to easily monitor your draw in use.
The 187's have a bit more volume, and with mine much better perc action. More of a light purr. This is a common Chinese iteration of a true matrix. Think the D020's still have just some diagonal slits.
My GB-187 is a straight neck and has stayed in the rotation for a year or so. My D020 usually only gets pulled out if I'm taking it somewhere because smaller and would be much less devastating if something happened to it.
One issue you should be aware of with steveminz's 187s is that the dewar joint at top tends to be a little recessed on these. Mine is, but hasn't really been a problem for me.
Everybody has to do what is right for them in context of cost and worth, but after having both for some time I would pick up the 187 and not give a second thought to the D020. If something happens to mine, I would replace it with this one immediately. Another D020? Only if I was taking it somewhere (via air travel) and was planning to leave it behind.
Thanks!
Does Stevens version stack bubbles like this?
Absolutely agree, especially with their prices.
So less bubbles equals better flavor? What's the tastiest bubbler around right now in a smaller design?
...
Contrary to what @ma0u says above, I don't think more diffusion is a good thing - not for vaping anyway. Maybe better for smoking or for dabs to smooth out the harshness of the hit - depending on how good/clean your concentrates are. But if you value taste and your vape gives a nice flavor profile, or you have yummy concentrates, I suggest you keep it slow and simple for best results..
Worst thing for a dabbing piece really seems to be excess size. From my experience, the quicker and smoother the diffusion transfer through the nail/stem to the mouthpiece is, the better. I have yet to find a piece better for dabbing than my FC-710 (w/ domeless female 14mm banger nail). The diffusion and pull for the 710 is PERFECT; the diffusion ball along with the greater water to air ratio seems to vape miracles
I know a lot of people are gonna find this info very helpful including myself. I was expecting a few flaws like the joint strength, but damn thats quite a few more than expected. My man you just saved me $60. Much appreciated!
"B squad" lmao
Its not cheap.. but its high quality... Everyone go check out the redesigned 2015 MOBIUS stereo matrix! Not sure if its more, but it looks like it has a shit ton of slits
https://jfriendly.com/products/detail/mobius-60t-stereo-matrix-2015-re-design
dude I ain't even exaggerating. Look at this:
bubbles everywhere
bubbles on the little disc:
Neck goes to the LEFT of can!!
The function was nothing to write home about. I've noticed that about Steven's Mopbius copies, some functions better than others. I've had 3x FC-187, 5x FC-186, 4x FC-200 and the bubble stacking ability definitely varies from poor to the one he shows in the video.
This piece is staying in the garage where it belongs!
I suspect it's a different squad because I've also gotten 3x Torus (1x V1 2x V2) and 5x Straight Fabs from Steven and none had any of these workmanship issues.
That shit really grinds my gears!! They shouldn't have sent that shit!!!