I can't tell if you're here for positive PR or what
Dude/dudette, there's no redemption for us. You saw the video. Hahahahaha.
I can't look away from this slow-motion train wreck.
You can't look away because you're a professional lurker.
I know, huh. Boggles my mind. Some manufacturers, retailers, reviewers, come to this site for a bit of self promotion, get challenged along the way, and come out the other side in such good standing that their visibility here has provided them what they hoped for. Others just self-destruct, and aren't even aware of it.
Damnit sam, I said I was done. It's all your fault.
Ok..........now I'm done.
Implication is that Vape Forest has exploded. Everyone run, it's raining purple trees! Wait, grab your jars!
Just because Sam Reynolds and lwien are are such cuties, it's time for another comparison. Only this time, it's more relevant than the last because we're going to compare the Ascent to the Solo and that's a close comparison, as both are top notch.
Arizer's Solo VS DaVinci's Ascent
Most of us are aware of the Solo and the quality of vapor it produces. This has been our go-to for a while, but as of late, it's been replaced in our lives by the Ascent and we're about to tell you why.
While the Solo has a decent sized loading chamber, the Ascent's is basically massive by portable standards. Both have roughly the same quality of vapor which when it came to the Ascent, was impressive because the Solo has been unmatched in that respect for so long in our opinions. So it was really a surprise to find that the vapor produced by the Ascent was on par with the Solo. Basically, they both taste great and from our experiences, we've concluded that they're both consistent and reliable.
When it comes to how long it takes for them to heat up, they're pretty close. While it obviously depends on what temperature you're using, it seems as if they're close enough that it's not worth noting any difference between the two. Keep in mind, we're typically running the Solo on level 2-3 which takes 60-70 seconds to heat up, whereas the Ascent takes around 60 seconds to heat up.
In regards to their size, the Solo is a bit more bulky. Ascents are definitely a bit sleeker and as a result they're easier to pocket. As far as cleaning goes, both are relatively easy to clean. Iso soak and rinse, no big deal.
In the end, with so many similarities, it comes down to the battery life and versatility. The battery on the Solo only lasts 1-2 hours, whereas Ascent lasts for 3-4 hours. In regards to versatility, Solo vaporizers weren't designed to vaporize oils, but the Ascents were.
This is a tough comparison to make, but for us, the answer (at least for now) is the Ascent. We say at least for now because our past experiences tell us that you can't really get an accurate assessment without testing over a prolonged period of time.
Note: like others have clearly stated time and time again, don't just eat up everything we have to say. Take it with a grain of salt. We have our opinions and they're not the end all conclusion so make sure to use your own noodle and think for yourself instead of relying on our opinions or the opinions of others.
mod note: Edit to add to a post- no back to back posting allowed. 3 posts merged.
We're just some dudes who like to vape and even amongst ourselves we argue over which vapes are the best. What the fuck do we know? Not enough, that's for sure.
