I watched the temp go down after I let it heat up to see how accurate it was. When the temp showed 100 I tried touching the heater. Still HOT. Guess the cooldown temps aren't completely accurate
Don't think 100 would be pretty damn hot, right?
You should keep in mind that the temperature indicated/reported is probably pretty accurate
for the place the sensor is.......which is probably not the cup? Good regulation of the load temperature (what we're really after) doesn't depend on the precision of this as much as the stability.
I think some of the excitement about 'amazingly fast heat up time' is also going on here? The indication is the sensor is happy but no vapor happening yet? There's a delay with having to heat the glass first before it can in turn heat the load which is easy to 'see' when you swap in a cold stem in a hot Solo. I've nothing in the way of measurements but I have a feeling that the normal heat up is longer still?
In Solo I much of this might be masked since the oven is heating slower allowing more heat to transfer before it indicates 'at temperature'? Something isn't quite making sense since the ovens are basically the same so unless the battery is supplying many times more power it can't really be much faster where it counts?
Your observation supports this I think, the sensor is most likely cooled to 100 or so but is still being heated by the hotter cup which retains a lot of heat (and therefore cools slowly)?
Eventually I will have two units I hope (or so is the plan) so I can do some A/B tests (say cold start and cold stem in hot Solo race with the same conditions otherwise) as well as some serious measurements trying to sort out the power management going on.
Fun stuff, for sure. Thanks for passing on the observation, food for thought indeed.
OF