MoltenTiger
Well-Known Member
Cheers BazThank you so very much, MoltenTiger.
First let me say that I agree completely with you and kingfisher...as I said above, I really think we need to adopt the attitude that vapes are household appliances, that our expectations of product and company should be commensurate, and that we should make excuses and come up with all kinds of body english to justify vapes that fall short of that standard (said justification being very vigorously pursued in the FC thread of another new portable). Successful vapes should "just work" IMO.
Thank you for the above. I do have a New Vape fine grinder that I like VERY much and with which I grind and dry herb for Volcano and conduction vapes. I will indeed try some in the GH, don't know that its pixie dust, but it is fine and it is dry. Perhaps I will find as you did that between fine and medium grind there ain't much difference.
Cheers
I will elaborate a bit more, now I'm not adding to a massive wall of text. Sorry
The amount of material and how it sits in the chamber differs the most between grind consistencies, and for sure if you use a chunkier grind it takes less herb to fill the chamber (which will again aid convection transfer, the flow of the fluid (air) over the material).
I call it pixie dust because it really is an unachievable consistency through any other means.
I will again underline it is the evenness of the grind which benefits any form of vaporisation over the actual size of the material, unless system-conduction transfer is the primary heat source (eg. Pax) where density becomes most important.
With convection, air flow is vital, and so maximising this will offer the best result.
Also, by having even size particles, it promotes an even transfer to the individual parts of the material smoothing heat curves and promoting sublimation.
It's all anecdotal, but it's only really something to consider if you directly compare, and even then tolerance negates any real testing