I consider it on demand simply by the nature of pretty quick heat up time, and being convection. Seems like most who want on-demand behavior use the v3 pro in session mode
Are you saying the session heat up time is significantly longer on fog pro v. V3?
FUTURAMA ah born to be bureaucrat!
I'm guessing that the two are very well matched. The Fog Pro heats up as quick as the V3 Pro or faster.
It certainly can handle fairly heavy use. I have put a lot herb through the Fog Pro in the past few days, and it hasn't clogged. The filter in the top does need to be cleaned regularly, but it doesn't require any extra fiddling around to keep things working.
Totally agree with this, so far. I do wish the chamber were a bit smaller.
Well, there are may be ways to shrink chamber size potentailly. Making the chamber bigger is a bigger challenge...
Im currently using a shaped top screen. This makes load/unload a litttle bit less convenient, but it's still manageable. It's keeping my filter screen clean. I've also noticed a good uptick in efficiency with small loads, so the tradeoff is worth it.
This is true. Flavor chasers should look elsewhere. It did improve after 4 or 5 sessions for me, but "muted" is still an accurate description.
I feel device temp is not accurate, maybe 10*C higher than what’s displayed, my 1st bowl was @ 330*F(165*C) and taste was really good and vapor density good as well which is strange that you good density at that low temp and unusually harsh when the temp is raised to 380*F(193*C) that tells me the actual temp is higher than indicated imo. Go lower for taste. Hate to do a comparison but the Rogue has slightly smaller bowl with full convection really does a better job in both taste and vapor density don’t know why. The Fog Pro was suppose to be my Rogue replacement when it’s battery dies, not sure now. When I couldn’t find the Fog Pro available I was looking at another Rogue for $156CDN during BF sales, but I wanted the replaceable battery.
Have you tried restricting the airflow?
Hi Robert! It's not a matter of vapor production it's more a flavor issue. Anyway i did like @Petetbay said and at 165 it's a bit more prominent and enjoyable. I can't really complain. It's a nice little vape. Do you know if there are any dosing capsules from other vapes that can fit the fog bowl?
What's the problem with the heating element? Being the airpath isolated doesn't exclude whichever problems it might have with the heating element?
Sorry, that is something I don't know. For me, I kind of like the big bowl
The airpath is isolated from the electronics. However, the heating element is directly in the airpath and one is breathing in air that has passed directly over that hot and maybe glowing element.
I don’t know for certain the material, but in Vape Guide review on 1st page lists the heating element specs and lists ceramic as bowl material which is wrong, it’s steel. So maybe that is really suppose to be the element material. You‘d have to email Topgreen support for the real answer, that’s my conclusion. PPN has stated he had a beta unit and said the heater is not the same as the V3Pro no mention of materials though.
If we all agree that it is stainless steel, I can explicitly state that, in the model overview I created.
Now I’m curious too…there’s too much to take into account when talking about healthy vapes. I bought a mighty cause I was searching something that I could use with no second thoughts. I vaped from a FF2+ for years though…and below the stainless steel bowl there was a glow so bright that you could really feel the heat…and now I don’t know if I want to know what’s the meaning of a glowing heating element
Now I’m curious too…there’s too much to take into account when talking about healthy vapes. I bought a mighty cause I was searching something that I could use with no second thoughts. I vaped from a FF2+ for years though…and below the stainless steel bowl there was a glow so bright that you could really feel the heat…and now I don’t know if I want to know what’s the meaning of a glowing heating element