Really? It appears that every other review has had SOME sort of issue. I do agree that it's probably better to wait for these wrinkles to be ironed out, but somehow I get the feeling from your tone that we should ACCEPT imperfections for $500?
Why am I not surprised?
I'm not suggesting that anyone
should do anything.
I was just making a simple observation, with a follow-on logical (well, at least to me) conclusion : Anyone who feels that there are "many problems" based upon "every other review" having "SOME sort of issue" will quite possibly be unsatisfied and therefore would probably be happier waiting until if/when those "many problems" are resolved. That's pretty straightforward.
Possibly the more relevant question is, why are you reading something into it that isn't there? Might it just be because
you don't think anyone
should accept "imperfections"? Just a wild guess based on the "tone" of your many "imperfection" posts.
Anyway, the crux of the matter here is (a) one's definition of "imperfections" and (b) frequency/ proportionality. It would seem that you have a very broad definition, from real product issues like a leaking HT or a heater malfunction, through to very subjective considerations such as upper screws on the casing getting hot when the unit is turned up high or the ticking noise, down to a missing ELB bag in one shipment. I suppose that with a broad enough definition, including every reviewer's cons, one might get to half the reviews having "issues". But still that's rather meaningless.
Because, all "imperfections" are not created equal, and some simply, well, aren't. One off's don't count. And while any owner is entitled to dislike, say, the subtle ticking, there aren't reports of any owner sending the unit back over these things; in other words, these "imperfections" are such for only a comparative few, and apparently not enough to reach the level of buyer's remorse. Cosmetic blemishes fit in the same category; entirely subjective and apparently not chasing away customers. That leaves the real actual product malfunctions, such as those reports about the heater and the HT flaws - these real imperfections are of course not acceptable.
But those defects need to be put in context. Frequency or proportionality is critical. A dozen such reports in a population of ~300 units shipped translates into a 4% reject rate. While that rate is higher than leading high-end electronics products, it is actually roughly on par with the universe of consumer products, including many expensive ones. It certainly isn't surprising for the first production runs of a small new manufacturer. It's also important to note that VXL has been exemplary in its responsiveness to customer problems; there haven't been any reports of an owner not being made whole.
At the end of the day, the market decides. For some, the perceived risks outweigh the cost and benefit of having the product; I gather that's where you are coming from at least for now. That fine. But still, the tone of this thread has been decidedly positive, pre-orders are not being cancelled in numbers, owners are not sending back units in droves, customers are not complaining about VXL leaving them in the lurch or being unresponsive. People vote with their wallets, and so far the vote has been near unanimous. Perhaps there is a message here.