I'm mainly concerned about the flower core, I mean it looked kind of ok in the videos, but Noah was working his ass off for those big hits!
I agree with you, guys shopping for 'huge clouds' should not be getting their hopes up too high. I've tried to be clear about that all along, but 'hope springs eternal' as they say.
Please stop and reflect, this is an
improved T1. Not magic. It uses a
smaller load (something asked for) and at
much lower power (also a design goal we asked for). Those two go together to some extent, larger loads would need more power for the same performance. Cera optimized bowl shape and improved insulation but this is just improvement, not earth shaking breakthroughs. Higher volume output is possible by pushing the factors, but it's a push. Noah did pretty good IMO, I can't match that really I don't think. And for sure neither of us can do so casually. If 'huge clouds' are the call for you I still think much larger loads and more power is the better way to get there. Kiss off long battery life and frugal use of bud of course, but having tried both Bender will get you huge clouds way better than Cera. FlashVape will also give impressive performance and very fast, but again using more power and bigger loads to do so. It's in the nature of the designs I think. No magic in Cera, past it's using very solid engineering and materials to meet it's design goals. There are techniques to maximize production, but they only go so far and have trade offs getting there.
Another point I think some might be missing is the power thing. It's not as simple as picking bigger numbers. First consider the numbers are only a 'snapshot in time' and while useful for relative ratings the ranges overlap hugely. I believe the carts are rated by TV at nominal (3.7) voltage. Let's assume they are, the example holds no matter what the scale is really. A one Ohm cart will deliver about 14 Watts at that voltage, at a little under 4 Amps. A 'hot off the charger' 4.2 Volts raises that current past 4 and bumps the total power to
18 Watts. Running it down to 3.3 Volts (a typical cut off?) drops the current to 3.3 Amps for
11 Watts total. The
same heater ran
18 to 11 Watts over the battery charge span. Being a convection vape, the user would have compensated by drawing a little less at the start and more at the end and most likely didn't even notice the power fall off.
The actual voltage at the load is less (typically 3.5 to 2.8 in my tests) due to resistance induced losses (heating) in the system, but the bottom line is if you get say five sessions from a charge (the claimed five times gain over T1), the 14 Watt core in the first session will be on par with the 16 on it's second session. And so on. It will 'beat' the 16 Watt one on it's 3rd, 4th and final sessions. Not that I think anyone will be able to determine by 'cloud size'.
In the end the heaters are developing more heat than we can put to good use. We take a part, the rest is wasted heating the unit mostly. Putting out more makes it a little easier for us to get all we can use (especially faster) but doesn't change anything that would really help give bigger clouds (like more THC in the load to start with does). It just makes it get hotter faster, we're still looking for the same 'magic temperature' in the same load. Roasting marshmallows over the campfire really isn't that much faster nor does it roast them better by a bonfire, all the larger fire really does is force the camper further back and burns up the firewood faster.
My opinion is the LL Cera does an excellent job for what it's really designed to do. A big improvement on T1 (which was already a good vape) even. It is not ideal for all users, nor is it really magic no matter how much it might seem so.
I believe customers will be very satisfied with it, provided their expectations are realistic. That last part I'm a little worried about.......
OF