You have to loosen the screw to adjust it then tighten it to lock it in place. The v1 always moved about on meHow do you change the ball head tip/cap Airflow on the Tempest 2? Or is that just on the v1 Tempest? Please and thank you in advance (newbie with Mad Heater and their Tempest.)
Not sure about the kit. But I don't think anyone got any emails, it was just a chance viewing of the page and I saw the wooden sleeves were in stock.So has the upgrade kit came out and sold out already or isit still due to come out? I didn't get any emails or anything about the wood sleeve and what not being live to buy
Nah, it comes out at the same time as the device launch. You've no missed out, all goodSo has the upgrade kit came out and sold out already or isit still due to come out? I didn't get any emails or anything about the wood sleeve and what not being live to buy
Thanks for the detailed setup. I love seeing people's specific settings. What kind of experience would you call this? DTL? And what do you think the balance is between convection and conduction? I'm guessing this is conduction heavy and probably hits hard.As there is a few discussions about Ruby ball temps I thought I'd share my current settings
I posted this on the r/madheaters subreddit
Set up - new wand adaptor, and 3mm rubies in the cap. Cap airflow fully open, stem airport closed off. Using a mini globe bong with water
Ive set the depth on the adaptor quite low (see pictures!). The wand temp set to 335c. Put the wand in automode and leave the Tempest in the wand until you get the "time over" message.
AVB looks pretty evenly roasted. Some darker spots on top but nothing to worry about as its still dark brown
Here are a few pics There are 4 in total but they are a bit out of order as I uploaded after taking the pictures
Are we talking cross purposes? Is this the v1 upgrade brought out when the v1 went release? Or an upgrade for v1 to use v2 bowl/cap? Or has there been another upgrade?The tempest 1 has been tested on here for what, 1.5 years before being released? The revolve stem the v1 uses also has been out for like 3 years.
But that also is beside the point I tried to make. It's ok to bring out an entirely redesigned version after just releasing a product several months before. But in that case I would expect a way cheaper upgrade pack for people who bought that product just some months ago.
Don't get me wrong, I love my tempest and will buy the upgrade pack either way.
I don't really see your point. If you release a new version not even a year after the original product came out I would expect an upgrade pack for people who bought the original product at a significant price reduction.Are we talking cross purposes? Is this the v1 upgrade brought out when the v1 went release? Or an upgrade for v1 to use v2 bowl/cap? Or has there been another upgrade?
I think the upgrade price is good enough.I would expect an upgrade pack for people who bought the original product at a significant price reduction.
Think it was me that said that.You said the time it is out does not matter. Would you also think it would have been fine if a new version was released 1 week after the v1 was sold out, together with an upgrade pack 25% of the price of the new product? One day? One minute? Where is the cutoff?
But it is an upgrade also fixing problems, not a sidegrade. The click disks don't work properly, this kit fixes it. It improves the functionality with torches and makes assembly and disassembly easier. Thats not just "different" or "new features". It is about improving existing features.Maybe the name of the kit is the issue, 'upgrade kit' might suggest there's a problem that needs addressing, maybe it could be called the booster kit, or heat pack - to calm any potential confusion.
As it stands, my tempest, yours, and probably everyone else's is working just fine, it's doing the job it was always designed to do - if this wasn't the case, then I'd be surprised that I'd need to shell out another £35 to get my device working properly, but that's not the case here, it still functions exactly as sold months after purchase.
Then a new product comes along, which maybe sparks an idea about offering some of the 'new features' from the 'new' device to the previous device.
I don't really see your point. If you release a new version not even a year after the original product came out I would expect an upgrade pack for people who bought the original product at a significant price reduction.
You claimed that you cannot expect "perfection out of the box when playing with new ideas". That's why I said it was developed and tested for years. It's not like someone made this in his garage, sold it to people and now gets feedback for the first time.
You said the time it is out does not matter. Would you also think it would have been fine if a new version was released 1 week after the v1 was sold out, together with an upgrade pack 25% of the price of the new product? One day? One minute? Where is the cutoff?
But the previous kit that launched in August with the tempest, fixed issues with the discs and coils I thought?But it is an upgrade also fixing problems, not a sidegrade. The click disks don't work properly, this kit fixes it. It improves the functionality with torches and makes assembly and disassembly easier. Thats not just "different" or "new features". It is about improving existing features.
Looking at other vapes, around a 2 year cycle seems fine to me. Anything under a year and imo the vape should just have stayed in development longer. Atleast if it is not about a new technology we did not have before (which is not the case here).Out of interest, if we look at things from your point of view, what would be a reasonable time frame for you? As far as I have understood, less than a year is too short for you? Would V1 need to have been out for say a decade (exaggeration for effect) before you considered the price to be reasonable for you?
So just wait until next year to buy itLooking at other vapes, around a 2 year cycle seems fine to me. Anything under a year and imo the vape should just have stayed in development longer. Atleast if it is not about a new technology we did not have before (which is not the case here).
But I won't make the claim that that is an objective truth, this honestly is just my opinion and I am perfectly fine with other people not agreeing with it.
The click disks were "fixed" in the sense that they click at the correct temperature. They need several minutes for the cool down click though, meaning that for multiple heat cycles you only have clicks with the first heat up. Thats the case with all v1 discs as far as I know.But the previous kit that launched in August with the tempest, fixed issues with the discs and coils I thought?
A company always has the option to keep a device in development a bit longer. The question is which time is reasonable, considering a company also needs money to survive. If you can design a better stem, a better head, easier assembly mechanisms etc. in just a few months, in that case the device should just have stayed in development longer in my opinion. If for whatever reasons a company can't do that, shit happens, but then I would expect cheaper upgrades for the old buyers who got a worse product simply because the company did not want to develop their products longer.As far as assembly being easier/better etc, that's come through the development of the V2, and he's decided to bring that to the V1 as an option.
Where does it end? Should we expect a kit for the V1 every time a new model comes out?
For me not, the problem stays the same.If the kit was never offered, it would have been accepted that the V2 has simply bettered the V1 and we'd all be quite happy?
That misses the point. How does me buying it later change the fact that one got a worse product because the company did not spend longer times on the development of the product.So just wait until next year to buy it![]()
That's not always the case unfortunately, especially if you have someone else making your products, they have time scales and lead times, and others customers products to deal with, I know this from experience in the trade in work in.A company always has the option to keep a device in development a bit longer.
Of the three heads I've owned, all three clicked twice on heat up, all three have one disc which took minutes to cool down (fair enough), and another which was more responsive, as in it'll click a few seconds after it hits a magnet, after I've been using it if course.The click disks were "fixed" in the sense that they click at the correct temperature. They need several minutes for the cool down click though, meaning that for multiple heat cycles you only have clicks with the first heat up. Thats the case with all v1 discs as far as I know.
mmm nice.snippity snip
Enjoy your Friday peepers, I have some goldberry waiting for me after work![]()
Do consumers get new phones or laptops at significant discount because they improved upon the technology or performance of the previous iteration (and these products are developed and released in similarly short timeframes)?I don't really see your point. If you release a new version not even a year after the original product came out I would expect an upgrade pack for people who bought the original product at a significant price reduction.
Thanks for the detailed setup. I love seeing people's specific settings. What kind of experience would you call this? DTL? And what do you think the balance is between convection and conduction? I'm guessing this is conduction heavy and probably hits hard.