JerryBears
Active Member
Sounds like a wonderful idea if anyone can give it a go.Anyone with a mighty willing to pack a full bowl, turn to max and take off the cooling unit to see?
Sounds like a wonderful idea if anyone can give it a go.Anyone with a mighty willing to pack a full bowl, turn to max and take off the cooling unit to see?
For you, maybe, but being that you don't know if that leakage is just residual from the cooling chamber or could, in fact, be due to more conduction going on than what is advertised, for me, this leakage would keep it way out of the "new gold standard of vaping" for me because two things that I put high on my priority list is efficiency and lack of smell and leakage contributes to both in the form of wasted vapor and additional smell.
The vapor path isn't that different from the Ascent and it leaked as well, with absolutely no pressure or fan pushing it out.
test for FC gonna use it pot pourri ^^
Edit gimme a min test @210°c which is max.. to be sure cap off.
Test: it is cooking slighty. damn hence conduction more then i thought it would but i never see it steaming like that with cap on seriously
I don't see how they 'add conduction', since it comes from the herb contacting a heated surface. It's either there in the design or it isn't. I think what they added was the fact that conduction heating was taking place, as well as convection. You can't have herb sitting in an enclosed heating chamber without some conduction heating going on.From S&Bs own copy they say they added conduction so you get good vapor starting from the very first hit.
If you watch my vid on the minivap then you'll see the same amount of "leakage" coming out of the drip tip at the end of the tube when I'm not hitting it. The minivap, being a full convection vape, that also doesn't heat the weed unless you're drawing through it has leakage of vapor too. How can this be? You might want to check out a T1, there is no leakage there as well as a firefly. This is MY new gold standard of vaping.For you, maybe, but being that you don't know if that leakage is just residual from the cooling chamber or could, in fact, be due to more conduction going on than what is advertised, for me, this leakage would keep it way out of the "new gold standard of vaping" for me because two things that I put high on my priority list is efficiency and lack of smell and leakage contributes to both in the form of wasted vapor and additional smell.
The vapor path isn't that different from the Ascent and it leaked as well, with absolutely no pressure or fan pushing it out.
If you watch my vid on the minivap then you'll see the same amount of "leakage" coming out of the drip tip at the end of the tube when I'm not hitting it. The minivap, being a full convection vape, that also doesn't heat the weed unless you're drawing through it has leakage of vapor too. How can this be? You might want to check out a T1, there is no leakage there as well as a firefly. This is MY new gold standard of vaping.
How about if someone here takes a bowl-sized screen and shapes it into a narrow deep dome. Place it into the Mighty bowl so that only a very small portion of the bowled screen makes contact with the Mighty bowl - as needed, reshape screen to further minimize contact with the inner bowl sides. Load screen, set to temp/s, draw, and see how minimized direct herb contact affects function & performance i.e., conduction/convection ratio now assumed to be leaning much more heavily towards convection. And does it still bleed-off a bit of vapor into the cooling chamber and through the mouthpiece as much between hits?I just want to chime in here that although I like convection properties ... I also like conduction properties ... (but I really don't like pure conduction vapes much at all ... the ratio needs to be in the "acceptable range" for me ... haven't quite determined what that is ... )
For instance, back when I owned a volcano, I would place the herb chamber on the Volcano while it heated up, then once heated would remove the top, add the herb, and take my hit. This yielded much more satisfactory bags with the added conduction properties of having a heated metal chamber (not super heated but definitely not cold). The issue I had with not preheating the chamber was that it then cooled the air temp too much and resulted in wispy vapor initially with increasing output as it heated ...
Anyways ... really just rambling here ... just mentioning this because I personally think a pre-warmed heating chamber helps a lot and a little conduction added to the convection mix is a good thing as long as its not too much.
Even in this scenario the stainless steel screen offers some conduction to the mix ... (really not trying to be argumentative by the way but just offering the argument out there with no scientific evidence to back it but just hypothesize that this is the case ... obviously decreasing the length of contact significantly reduces the conduction effect ... one could have more pure convection in some cases as well where the herb "flies about" and thus resists conduction and increases convective effects ... but in most cases where the herb has contact with an increasingly heated surface ... that has to add enough conductive effect ... just some thoughts )How about if someone here takes a bowl-sized screen and shapes it into a narrow deep dome. Place it into the Mighty bowl so that only a very small portion of the bowled screen makes contact with the Mighty bowl - as needed, reshape screen to further minimize contact with the inner bowl sides. Load screen, set to temp/s, draw, and see how minimized direct herb contact affects function & performance i.e., conduction/convection ratio assumed to be leaning heavily towards convection. And does it still bleed-off a bit of vapor into the cooling chamber and through the mouthpiece between hits?
Firefly time?The ONLY time I want my herbs being cooked is when I'm hitting hit.
I just tested it. Turned up to 410 with a full bowl without the cooling chamber. (gonna post video soon) There is a fair bit of conduction, but at 410 I bet the pax has a lot more.
Firefly time?
I was thinking that the conduction aspect of these vapes was more of a pre-heat than a constant thing, like once the chamber is up to temp convection takes over. Does this make any sense to you guys?
Re my little experiment posted above: While considering that conduction is reduced, I may have erringly assumed that convection increases (it does only in ratio?). When drawing, I think that the standard operating measure of convection probably remains mostly unchanged, irrespective of conduction. I wonder if there is a senser that coordinates a conduction/convection/draw ratio with an algorithm. Anyway, I'm curious to know how it performs with as much conduction as can be eliminated. If it performs strongly with vapor production and flavor with less conduction involved, that might be something that the user can regulate via the app. Some folks prefer convection flavor, some folks haven't a preference. Further, conduction cooks (though I doubt it cooks all that much): an app could perhaps allow us to turn down the oven and still permit full convective heating. Again, I catch myself assuming that there are two independent heaters at work here. Just my fingers tapping out thoughts.Even in this scenario the stainless steel screen offers some conduction to the mix ... (really not trying to be argumentative by the way but just offering the argument out there with no scientific evidence to back it but just hypothesize that this is the case ... obviously decreasing the length of contact significantly reduces the conduction effect ... one could have more pure convection in some cases as well where the herb "flies about" and thus resists conduction and increases convective effects ... but in most cases where the herb has contact with an increasingly heated surface ... that has to add enough conductive effect ... just some thoughts )