The Firefly is stated to have a heating element that achieves as high as 40W, and for that they have massive insulation and it still gets warm to the touch. Additionally, their state-of-the-art battery gets drained pretty well by that. They did it anyway, to achieve the glorious clouds.
How will the GH live up to its makers' claims of 30W without anywhere near as much insulation? Defying physics? Both companies had access to NASA materials, so I don't think they can claim they have something no one else has.
Additionally, how is the GH's magical $5 battery going to put out that kind of power, let alone last for the ridiculous periods of time they claim? Not possible.
To me, a best case scenario for the GH is that it is a reasonable pen vape, outperforming some of the existing ones, but not breaking the ground they claim it will break. You get what you pay for, folks.
Encouraging video. Keep in mind that was at 360F. Lighting conditions weren't ideal for seeing vapor production either. Others experience/vapes may differ, but I don't get huge clouds from any of my vapes at 360F. Would be interesting to see 380-390F.
I think that they showed it at a low temperature because they can't show that sustained of a vape session at the higher temperatures. That battery ain't gonna cut it. One or two clouds tops.