A serious, experienced, deep-pocketed, 'Angel Investor' would not look at this project twice - for many of the reasons expressed by we skeptics on this thread, and for many more reasons guided by tough business-savvy criteria that I feel could not be met. An angel investor, first and foremost, would look to see that those in the driver's seat steering their prospective investment can handle adversity with competence, grace, and an ability to respond to constructive criticism appreciatively, timely, and with a turn-it-around can-do attitude (no lame excuses). Moreover, a serious prospective investor will require much more than just a concept and renderings that look good on paper (or a few sketchy-at-best videos). Even a somewhat refined functioning prototype in development won't cut it without solid EVIDENCE that it actually works as preliminarily advertised or privately claimed. Further, do the people steering the investment really understand the full spectrum and depth of what comprises their intended consumer market (e.g., range of preferences, experience, and technology, etc.)? The list goes on and on, and it gets tougher as it goes.
ZP/GH is most fortunate that such a funding vehicle as Indiego exists, and fortunate also for the wealth of resource that FC provides. I feel much is being taken for granted in these regards. The fact that a response to my/our concerns were hard pressed, slow in coming, terse, and finally concluded with a harsh quip expressed in righteous indignation (an inappropriate comment re a desire for 'Likes'), has not earned my confidence. Explanations offered in defense of video GH vapor production and of claims to be on par with desktop vapes have been extremely lame and even dubious IMO, and have in total spoken volumes to me. I will let the prior 35 pages of this thread, and various media out there in the world, speak for itself.
February 2014 is a very ambitious goal to be met on such short order. Best of luck to the 'Early Birds' (most generous and forgiving 'Angel Investors')!