Just tossing this out, FYI.
All my tips are Ti except for the one that came on my M18 so the one I use 99% with this induction heater is also Ti. Tonight, I thought I would test the stainless steel tip that came with my M18 and see how well it works with this heater.
I wanted to get the tests as close to the Ti tests and I wanted another glass want so the tests would be more close to equal. Darn, DDave is out of the long water wands. Well, looked though my drawers and found these one hitters that fit the VapCap tip perfectly. So, I popped the stainless tip off my M18 and put it into this glass mouthpiece.
On a side note, these are 6 for $8 on eBay and Amazon.
I found the stainless tip to heat a little slower in the induction heater than the Ti tip. I believe that is also true when heating with a torch. When heated from a cold cap to the second click, the vapor was weak and very pinene tasting. A nice hit but not the blast you usually get from a VapCap. From a cold cap, heating it a second or so after the click gives a full hit.
The hits were a little 'smoother' than with the Ti tip.
The tip seemed to cool faster as I only got 1 or 2 hits per heating session vs 2 or 3 with the TI. Even when the Stainless was heated a little tiny bit past the click to reach full heat, it still seemed to cool faster than the Ti, which, I believe, is contrary to the torch.
Once the cap was warm, the heater had no problem bring it to second click well before it timed out.
When I do the second heating with my Ti tip, I don't wait for the cool down click. I insert the tip for about a second and that's usually enough for 2 more hits. Then, back in for a second and 2 more hits. With the stainless tip, the second heating was closer to 2 seconds. Maybe even 2.x seconds. Not 3. Still, obviously longer than the Ti.
So, in conclusion, the Ti tip seems to work better in this induction heater than the stainless tip, although both of them work just fine.