biohacker
H.R.E.A.M
Or should I still send out the simple beta stems in the meantime?
Sure! Why not?
Or should I still send out the simple beta stems in the meantime?
Hi all,I am more anxious than ever to get a real one-piece glass stem, in both 14 and 18mm.
My Supreme is now actually performing better with this thin glass. Makes a large difference. The draw restriction with this particular glass is identical to what I experience with the original aluminum tubes.
I just want to stress that the draw restriction improvement seems dramatic to me. The setup I have now is absolutely perfect.
SO, going forward, I suppose a design consideration that I can now say is critical will be the thickness of the glass used for the bowl portion. Ideally, the thinner here the better, but I understand breakage will still have to considered as well.
Thanks for everyone's input. I have 10mm with 1mm walls that I can play with in the flame before committing to 9mm. There is a method of condensing the glass on one end to thicken the glass up for the 14/18mm joint.@justvapin thanks man, that's good to know (that the straight stems have thinner walls).
I have exactly the same issue with @VAPEHUNTER 's cut down bent stems... the restriction is so much more fun with the stock aluminium ones...
@PeteSeattle I'd prefer as large an ID as possible, but dunno how easy it'd be forming the joint from 1mm thick tubing... that pinch would be pretty thin too...
I'd be considering blowing the joint separately using bigger/thicker walled tubing and welding the tubing to it afterwards
You'd also be able to drop the pinch and just add a couple of dots around the bottom of the tube before making the weld..?
Just a thought keep up the good work man
P.S.....none of this is meant to be any kind of slight toward the tubes I got from @VAPEHUNTER...they were perfect in every way!!!! ....I'm just pointing out the difference in the thickness of the glass...
Hey! That's is great informationSo I ordered these for @DDave :
https://www.ddavemods.com/store/p52/Quad_(4)_Preload_18mm_Stem_Pack.html
I was hoping to get lucky and they would fit into the Supreme. Guess what---they do! If they were longer and had a dimple at the point the stem gets slim, we'd have a bowl. BUT----the glass in the stem is 1.5mm thick at least, and the draw restriction is once again quite limited. But it does fit.
I actually ordered these just to see if they would fit, and also to cut down and use with the set-up I have outlined above. So I cut about 3/4 inch off of one of them, and attached it to the bowl portion I have (which I also cut down as far as I could), and now I have a working set-up that is exactly 3 7/8 inches long.
I am using the thin walled stem/bowl, and I simply cannot stress enough how excellent this is. Getting it shorter didn't change anything except making it more user friendly. The reduced draw restriction is what makes all the difference.
Can't wait to see the final product @PeteSeattle comes up with. It is going to be phenomenal.
I second this as I don't own one. Does anyone have a non-functioning model for test fitting? How easy is it to contact Ed?this thread can be so confusing with no pics of all of these glass setups that all of yall are using..i just wanna see a supremem with the glass stems inserted..
this thread can be so confusing with no pics of all of these glass setups that all of yall are using..i just wanna see a supremem with the glass stems inserted..
I don't think there is such a thing as a "non-functional" Supreme vaporizer. I think it would take someone deliberately trying to destroy it to make it not be able to function.Does anyone have a non-functioning model for test fitting? How easy is it to contact Ed?
Thank you!
I don't think there is such a thing as a "non-functional" Supreme vaporizer. I think it would take someone deliberately trying to destroy it to make it not be able to function.