Hippie Dickie said:
@Wes, re: glass tube -- have you considered different diameters? i found a noticable difference between my standard 12mm x 4" tube and a 16mm x 6" tube -- i think the extra volume from increased diameter has more effect than the extra length. And i agree 4" is a convenient size -- plus i'm more likely to bump or knock over my 6" tube.
Also, i see most condensation in the part of the tube closest to the heater -- that first inch, after that, virtually no condensation. And, yeah, glass really doesn't transmit heat very far -- when the end is at 400F, it is possible to touch/hold the tube 2" away from the hot end (i think i'm remembering that right -- it's been a while since i tried that).
I agree the portability of the 4" is most desirable for me, it seems like the strongest as well. The 6" will cool better but is a bit more clumsy and I am most definitely more on the clumsy side.
I have not explored any other size tubing yet... this may require different bowl sizes/hole sizes/different o-ring size/ screen size... but is a good idea if your interested in further cooling...
just some real rough estimations just for fun:
the 4" will have around .79"^3 of volume --- (the lateral surface area will be around 6.28"^2)
the 5" will have around .98"^3 of volume --- (the lateral surface area will be around 7.85"^2)
the 6" will have around 1.18"^3 of volume --- (the lateral surface area will be around 9.42"^2)
Just for reference you would .38"^3 more volume going from 4" to 6" and from 4" to 6" again you would have an extra 3 square inches of surface area. I could be wrong on this stuff, I'll double check my calculations but just use this for reference.