Thank you, nicelytoasted, for the informative post! Any ballpark on how much it would cost to have such a test done?
The reality is, vape makers are not going to run lab tests on their vapes any time soon. It's up to us to do our own homework. This thread is an attempt at doing so. It's gotten ugly more than once but we have made some progress and know more now than when we started out.
We now know that Myrtlezaps use, in the heated portion and air path, some 260 brass which contains ~0.07% lead (apparently considered lead-free), and also some brass of unknown composition which contains enough lead to test positive when a lead surface test is used. We now know that it only takes about 0.0006g of inhaled lead to raise the blood lead level to 10 micrograms per deciliter which is considered a cause for concern by international health agencies. We also now know that Tom's middle name is Clyde.
I know that folks who own MZs may find this discussion offensive because it calls into question a product they use and enjoy. While I understand the sentiment, I find it offensive to see personal attacks and calls for a closure of this discussion based purely on that fact. This is not "Us vs Them". I will continue to keep it clean and would ask that you do the same. If you don't like this discussion feel free to not read this thread.
Like it or not, lead is a dangerous substance. When a product from China is discovered to contain lead it gets pulled off the market, accompanied by a lot of publicity. Many people don't seem to have a problem assuming any vaporizer made in China is unsafe. I have seen the same posters who are defending the MZ's lead content warn others about "dangerous" Chinese vaporizers. What gives?
If a no-name Chinese vaporizer was found to have lead in the air path I really can't see anyone defending it, let alone attacking those discussing the issue. If an asthma inhaler was found to have lead inside it I don't imagine anyone would be saying "well it's safe under the operating temperatures". Even if it was theoretically safe under typical usage conditions, the risk would be still be great enough for it to be pulled.
Rick, you keep implying that I'm pushing some big agenda, that I'm playing sides, and that I'm out of line here. Since you've called me out multiple times I will respond. My agenda is to facilitate discussion and information regarding vaporizers. If any other vape was suspected to have lead in the air path I would be involved in the discussion the same as I am here. I have no vendetta against you, in fact, I respect you in more ways than one.
I do think you are out of line for questioning my integrity. Before this discussion you had no idea how much lead your product contained. To assume it was a complete non-issue because your friends told you so is questionable in my eyes, especially considering the number of people who breathe through your product on a daily basis. You say that you're a risk taker. Drilling and machining the leaded brass is proven to produce a very serious risk. To me, someone who doesn't care much about his own health is unlikely to be concerned with mine.
The reality is, vape makers are not going to run lab tests on their vapes any time soon. It's up to us to do our own homework. This thread is an attempt at doing so. It's gotten ugly more than once but we have made some progress and know more now than when we started out.
We now know that Myrtlezaps use, in the heated portion and air path, some 260 brass which contains ~0.07% lead (apparently considered lead-free), and also some brass of unknown composition which contains enough lead to test positive when a lead surface test is used. We now know that it only takes about 0.0006g of inhaled lead to raise the blood lead level to 10 micrograms per deciliter which is considered a cause for concern by international health agencies. We also now know that Tom's middle name is Clyde.
I know that folks who own MZs may find this discussion offensive because it calls into question a product they use and enjoy. While I understand the sentiment, I find it offensive to see personal attacks and calls for a closure of this discussion based purely on that fact. This is not "Us vs Them". I will continue to keep it clean and would ask that you do the same. If you don't like this discussion feel free to not read this thread.
Like it or not, lead is a dangerous substance. When a product from China is discovered to contain lead it gets pulled off the market, accompanied by a lot of publicity. Many people don't seem to have a problem assuming any vaporizer made in China is unsafe. I have seen the same posters who are defending the MZ's lead content warn others about "dangerous" Chinese vaporizers. What gives?
If a no-name Chinese vaporizer was found to have lead in the air path I really can't see anyone defending it, let alone attacking those discussing the issue. If an asthma inhaler was found to have lead inside it I don't imagine anyone would be saying "well it's safe under the operating temperatures". Even if it was theoretically safe under typical usage conditions, the risk would be still be great enough for it to be pulled.
Rick, you keep implying that I'm pushing some big agenda, that I'm playing sides, and that I'm out of line here. Since you've called me out multiple times I will respond. My agenda is to facilitate discussion and information regarding vaporizers. If any other vape was suspected to have lead in the air path I would be involved in the discussion the same as I am here. I have no vendetta against you, in fact, I respect you in more ways than one.
I do think you are out of line for questioning my integrity. Before this discussion you had no idea how much lead your product contained. To assume it was a complete non-issue because your friends told you so is questionable in my eyes, especially considering the number of people who breathe through your product on a daily basis. You say that you're a risk taker. Drilling and machining the leaded brass is proven to produce a very serious risk. To me, someone who doesn't care much about his own health is unlikely to be concerned with mine.