OKay, now that we've dealt with what doesn't work why not consider a simple addition which i know
DOES work:
Lets describe it from left to right. 1st, an in-line dimmer. 2nd, a triple outlet extender. 3rd, a 300 mW resistive device (LED lamp seems fine). Last but not least, the HerbalAire pump of which we only see the power plug here (in black).
Ain't that simple/compact enough?
Now please take note that the triple outlet extender must match with the A.C. outlet on the dimmer. In my own situation there happened to be screws on the back of that extender so i just opened it and removed the ground pin/bus, making it a perfect fit for the two-contacts dimmer outlet. Also, pay attention to the middle outlet on that extender: it's hidden behind my large LED lamp and that's a good thing because
THE HERBALAIRE VAPORIZER MUSN'T BE CONNECTED TO ANY DIMMER WHATSOEVER.
Next, lets comment on airflow control: this dimmer has no buttons because the power cord connected to its outlet acts like an antenna that detects when we touch it (through the cable's insulation layer, of course). This means that to adjust my pump's airflow i only need to touch its power cord briefly, each touch making the dimmer cycle throuh its set of available power levels. Isn't that convenient?!
Lets consider level 0 is "Off", level 1 is " power", level 2 is " power", level 4 is "" and level 5 is "fully On", euh...
I believe that suggests i can multiply the concentration of noble vapor by 4, 2 or 1.3, with "Off" and "On" settings being 0 % and 100 % power (no multiplication).
Finally, with the matter of concentration (thickness) handled, my next point will be bag airflow once it's been filled...
So, we have a bag which should be four times "thicker" at best. Imagine if its mouthpiece were made a tiny bit larger, say enough to fit a 5/16" I.D. 7/16" O.D. tube inside its opening, rendering that bag compatible with the Zephyr in in the process!... Well, 7/16" that's almost as large as the whole HerbalAire mouthpiece itself, now how does the airflow of a 7/32" opening compare with that of a 7/16" opening? Hummm... I'm not sure about the airflow but i'd say the opening's diameter doubled, in such a case! Consequently, my guess is this would mean a 4:1 improvement in terms of airflow, so... Where would that lead us to get 4:1 concentration-improved vapor in a bag with a 4:1 improved airflow?...
A 16:1 improved hit, perhaps?