CalyxSmokr
Well-Known Member
Last edited:
it is really just different consistencies and how the oil is treated after blasting. Shatter is harder to make and will wax up if you stir it etc.
Mostly shatter is better but that is not a rule. Shatter takes more care so generally it is made from higher quality bud - but there are exceptions. I think shatter works better in vape pens than wax too.
I don't know if it was worth it. Can't find a thread on version 2. I anticipate sending mine back once it arrives
I don't know if we would be upgrade or warranty eligible
I completely agree about the upgrade issue. And, I'd consider it a nice bonus if it was covered by warranty.Since the upgrade program has been suspended, its not upgrade eligible, and really it shouldnt be. Buying a close out item at around 40% retail and expecting the manufacturer to replace it with a top of the line model is a bit much. I see no reason why it wouldnt be covered under Hazes 10 year warranty though. You would need to check with Scott on that but Im pretty sure Vape USA is an authorized reseller. The Haze 2.5 ( which is what you likely received ) is an excellent unit. It functions quite like the V3 in most ways. There were some minor upgrades but they are functionally very similar. The cans between the two are interchangable so if you want the new upgraded V3 cans you can buy them as accessories and they will work fine in the 2.5 Honestly a new 2.5 for what you paid is a real bargain. Its not the latest model but its a damned good unit.
Since the upgrade program has been suspended, its not upgrade eligible, and really it shouldnt be. Buying a close out item at around 40% retail and expecting the manufacturer to replace it with a top of the line model is a bit much. I see no reason why it wouldnt be covered under Hazes 10 year warranty though. You would need to check with Scott on that but Im pretty sure Vape USA is an authorized reseller. The Haze 2.5 ( which is what you likely received ) is an excellent unit. It functions quite like the V3 in most ways. There were some minor upgrades but they are functionally very similar. The cans between the two are interchangable so if you want the new upgraded V3 cans you can buy them as accessories and they will work fine in the 2.5 Honestly a new 2.5 for what you paid is a real bargain. Its not the latest model but its a damned good unit.
I registered my serial with Haze last night but haven't heard back yet. I'll post back when they confirm what version it is. No matter what version I'm still really liking it.Vape USA buyers. Please post the definitive answer to is it a V2 or V2.5
Thanks
Maybe serial number to Haze and they can give the 100% correct answer
I had time now to thest my new V3 and I have to say that it works amazing. I have also the solo / Extreme Q as a comparison.
What I like a lot about the V3 is that compared to the two others you have no draw resistance, what makes the vaping experience much more pleasant.
The only negative I can think of is flavor. The flavor is good and towards the end of the bowl better than my Flowermate. However, at the beginning the Flowermate has a much stronger herbal taste that I don't get as much with the Haze v3. I usually start at 2 and then finish at 3, I may have to try the first heat setting and see if I get that taste.
Thanks gameenders, this thread led me to purchasing one as well, your initial impressions solidified that. Just waiting for a good deal. Really hoping to find it under 200 but I might just have to bite the bullet.
You should definitely start at 1. It gives great taste.
I thought I might not like the cans as much but it has made maintaining and cleaning this thing a breeze and very convenient.
I may have to try the first heat setting and see if I get that taste.
You should definitely start at 1. It gives great taste.
I just got the Haze v3 a week ago after reading through this thread (thanks to all the helpful posters). The only vaporizer I own is the Flowermate v5.0s, and the Haze is better for me in so many ways. I love loading two separate loading areas, I usually do two sessions a night and this means I get great flavor twice. The vapor production is very good and I would say effortless compared to my Flowermate, the draw has just the right amount of resistance. I can also clear a chamber in about half the hits of my Flowermate, which is perfect for me. And the size is quite a bit smaller than I thought it would be from the pictures, I took it out on a date night and my palm completely covers it.
I was thinking I would only like the conduction screens, but the convection hit almost as well (which surprised me), taste a little better longer into your session, and keep your chambers clean. I tried the oil can and the flower can as well loaded with flower, they all work great! I pack it down with one of the cans, or if they are not handy with the back of the tweezers. I thought I might not like the cans as much but it has made maintaining and cleaning this thing a breeze and very convenient. I love that it uses 18650 batteries so you can swap them out whenever. I ordered the D020-D with an adapter from Delta3D, I can't wait to try it.
The only negative I can think of is flavor. The flavor is good and towards the end of the bowl better than my Flowermate. However, at the beginning the Flowermate has a much stronger herbal taste that I don't get as much with the Haze v3. I usually start at 2 and then finish at 3, I may have to try the first heat setting and see if I get that taste.
This thing has impressed me every day so far. I think I'm in love . Any compromises this thing makes it seems to make the right way, I really like this little device.
For the previous commenters referring to coupon code I got mine on puffitup and the coupon code PUFFEDUP gave 15% off, which made it right around 210$. Hopefully I can post this here, first time poster.
I guess it's just the v2.5 but my recently received unit (it's either a 2.5 or v2) doesn't seem to give vapor till temp 3. Is that normal? I can get a slight taste at one but nothing visible and not much sensation when compared to my Pax 2 at temp 1.Welcome to the family! Thanks for taking the time to write that nice review.
As others have said, level 1 is tasty town. I sometimes kill a whole chamber on that temp.
It's a 6.9 on the Richter ScalePlease post the definitive answer to is it a V2 or V2.5
Anyone else hear that to the tune from Funky Town? That's awesome and now it will be in my head all day. :-)Welcome to the family! Thanks for taking the time to write that nice review.
As others have said, level 1 is tasty town. I sometimes kill a whole chamber on that temp.
.......................................................................I guess it's just the v2.5 but my recently received unit (it's either a 2.5 or v2) doesn't seem to give vapor till temp 3. Is that normal? I can get a slight taste at one but nothing visible and not much sensation when compared to my Pax 2 at temp 1.
Are you folks with these new units getting zero, zilch, nada on level 1? Level 1 on the v2 and prior has a temp geared towards e-liquid specifically and level 1 for the 2.5 was set around 350F so you should be able to get some lighter vapor if it's a 2.5 but not expect anything if it's earlier than a 2.5.
I am still confirming the serial numbers. I know who shipped it but am waiting on confirmation of what version we were shipping then.
Welcome to the family! Thanks for taking the time to write that nice review.
As others have said, level 1 is tasty town. I sometimes kill a whole chamber on that temp.
Are you folks with these new units getting zero, zilch, nada on level 1? Level 1 on the v2 and prior has a temp geared towards e-liquid specifically and level 1 for the 2.5 was set around 350F so you should be able to get some lighter vapor if it's a 2.5 but not expect anything if it's earlier than a 2.5.
I am still confirming the serial numbers. I know who shipped it but am waiting on confirmation of what version we were shipping then.
Yep....Back then it was start on three and finish on four. Once and a while I would kick it on two for a few but from what I recall the vapor was pretty thin there too (but visible and tasty)........................................................................
I know Haze Original model reviews were that temps 1 and 2 (of 4) were deemed useless as the temps were too low. Strong recommendation went to Haze to raise the temps.
V 2.5 had the higher temps.
?? Not sure if V 2.0 had the higher temps ?? Anybody know form sure?