Let me start off by saying that I am a huge FW7 fan… it’s sexy-sleek, minimal, only has one job and it does it well… add the versatility of using a glass piece or j-hook (my favorite) with the WPA and it's easy to see why it’s been my daily flower driver (DTv5 for concentrates) since I got it last July…
I put 7 up for a well deserved vacation on Friday when I received my new pal FW8… despite my admiration for its predecessor and all the raving reviews I didn’t set my expectations too high since I figured there would be some kind of learning curve, even if minimal. My experiences from Friday night (after 1st battery charged completely) to last night could be summed up in 1 word… Disappointing. Vapor production was sparse no matter what I did… half bowl, full bowl, light pack, heavy pack, nothing changed… the draw was always open and airy, which I kind of expected with the larger intake holes and increased focus on convection, and just when I felt I started getting decent vapor it was already at the point where the bowl was tasting toasty and close to combustion.
Last night I was clearing and cleaning the oven chamber and saw a bit of particulate in the narrow part of the glass so I pulled it out to give it a quick iso bath and put in the ‘spare’ glass mouthpiece… and immediately felt a difference… the first mouthpiece slides easily, like a slide whistle or a trombone, while the second is a noticeably snugger fit. I would not have thought it would make such a difference, especially after taking a side by side pic of both mouthpieces (the ‘good’ one is the one with the silicone adapter on the end) and seeing absolutely no difference between the two, however…
In my quest to gather further empirical data, I tested two bowls with the 2nd mouthpiece last night…
I don’t remember actually *seeing* my Ancient Oriental Ancestor last night, but I know I spoke his name aloud and involuntarily more than twice…
Ho
Lee
FUKK!
Testing will continue…