Why is it that this vaporizer industry is so obsessed with authorised retailers and being so strict with warranty etc? Surely it doesn't matter?
Actually I think it matters a lot from at least two 'angles'. First off, Dealer Agreements often contain terms like the Distributor or Dealer assuming the costs of warranty replacements. As we all know, shipping and customs can be a serious problems sometimes if the original 'deal' included localized service it seems reasonable to expect the maker to insist on what was agreed? I've worked for companies that had this policy for that very reason. We'd get a box of trash, pieces of our fluorescent lamps which RV or boat owners had ripped out an mailed to us when told to do so by a salesman......
Secondly, it's a legal matter. Warranties are contracts, they need 'quid pro quo' to be binding. Since you, as the end user, have no relationship with the maker (unless you bought directly from him) you have no legal rights. He had no control of the conditions you bought it under. The only legally binding deal you have is with the guy that sold it to you. He might or might not have recourse from there, but he's the guy that claimed it's covered under warranty. If he
volunteers, as in the case of ESV, to repair/replace units he didn't directly sell to the end user the maker that's well and good (and IMO a good policy in many/most circumstances) it's not legally binding since there is no contract covering it.
Even if the maker says he'll honor the original warranty, it's his call, he doesn't have to and you have no recourse even if he 'promised'. A promise is not a contract, no quid pro quo......as explained to me. This is why you see contracts written for $1 (and why PIs on TV ask their new clients for a dollar, it makes them legally hired).
That's the way the law works. I've been on this side too. In fact from 'both sides' of it. From our company 'holding the line' in the face of Dealers that sold old/defective/used gear by pointing to the date code and telling the buyer 'it's under a year old, the Factory warranty will cover the repair'.... A guy in Florida became pretty famous in several marinas for doing this. I've also been caught with a piece of 'nearly new' test equipment Purchasing made a great deal on. When it didn't work we found out the maker wasn't interested in giving us free service. Expensive lesson, but the company lawyer said our alternative was to go after the dealer (who had no shop or skills). We paid 'time and materials' to fix it.
Rest assured many other industries work the same way. In fact with the exception of things like Federally mandated SMOG control on cars I can't think of an exception? Can anyone?
So I see two reasons why. One it might defeat a lower wholesale price deal covering other warranty agreements. Secondly such an arrangement would not be legal under the laws. You could not 'demand coverage'. Your contract is with the guy you gave your money to.
Or so I understand the rules.
OF