After havin some good time to compare my desktop vapes, it seems the Nano more easily hits the flavor sweetspot compared to my other. I believe this is because the tiny holes for airflow really monitor how much air you're allowed to suck in, making it so the flavor isn't "watered (aired) down". The heated air is also channeled in a narrower path, which I think helps to pull more flavor.
Now...this doesn't mean I can't achieve the same flavor effect with a high airflowed vape, but...you can tell it doesn't come as naturally as a Nano.
For all you flavor chasers out there, I can almost guarantee you made the absolute best decision on vapes when hooking up to water.
Due to being able to pack more in the LSV, the dry hits can REALLY coat your mouth with flavor, which I haven't been able to subjectively achieve with the Nano, maybe due to the lower amount packed. (I had only ever felt that coating feeling with the first draw of an Air/Solo after a long heat soak)
This leads me to believe airflow isn't as much of a flavor factor on dry draw...that comes from the design of the vape itself and the airpath/vaporpath.
I believe the goal of flavor-through-bubbler is to have as much vapor density reach the mouth at the same time, which the Nano does spectacular through water due to the airflow. While I can get larger hits from the LSV due to the huge airflow and larger bowl, I can't technically get as dense of milk in the chamber of my bubbler, and so the bubbler flavor isn't as facepunching as the Nano (unless i draw super slow, but this is why I mentioned the Nano does it
Naturally).
Hope you guys like my interpretive science, haha.
I love touching wood