What will you do when the Haze or Grasshopper get wet or you drop it and the electronics go out? I feel that I can get just as good as or better vape from the VC than I do from the E-nano. I'm just a heavy user and it seemed as though battery vapes could never keep up with my demand. Sure with some you could get an extra battery but that is added cost and more to carry around. I kind of like the smaller chamber because honestly you can only get so high. Problem with loading a big bowl or chamber is that you may be over doing it and waste material or get higher than you wanted to. Like I said I'm a heavy user and I don't find the .05 chamber in some vapes to really be an issue.
Easy there, big fella. VC is awesome and don't think it can be beat for the price (even the Ti/Woody can only be bested in bang-for-buck by the OG glass, and that's only a maybe). But, if you can get better vapor than from the nano, I want you to give me a proper training on how to use mine (or maybe I can help you out with nano technique).
There are also battery vapes out there, coming out now, and still in production that can probably do a little better with vapor production (Milaana sure does!), but not at this price or as simply depending on your perception of "simple".
Also true "you can only get so high", but 1 or 2 loads in the VC aren't going to get most there - certainly not me, and neither are 3 or 4. But, I've always felt the first few hits are where it's at with vaping. After that, you can still extract but isn't really the same taste wise or otherwise. VC is awesome through hits 1 & 2 and 3 usually isn't too bad, but more of a cleanup. With easy dump and reload, VC keeps me very happy on all fronts.
VC is an amazing vaporizor and tough to beat if you're not near power, and I'd say impossible to beat at its pricing. Also, pretty discrete and a small package to carry (even with stash and lighter). I'm a fanboy, too. But, lets try to keep it realistic so as not to lose credibility with those who are researching and wondering if this is all just hype - or if this is a worthwhile vape. It definitely is a giant killer and think it would do well as an addition to anyone's vape arsenal.
@mrboxer .... I think the Ti/Woody is a big step up from the OG VC. No doubt worth the cost difference IMO. And, not just for the look/feel of it. It does perform better IME, and for me is well worth the upgrade! I don't have an OmniVap, and probably won't get one. It does look sweet, and many may appreciate the adjustability of airflow. I would probably use it as much closed as possible, and have been able to shut off the airflow in my Ti/Woody by moving the internal O-ring down just below the hole. Easy to do (sometimes a flat ended toothpick helps if it tries to roll back up on insertion), and once it is in there it stays until you take everything apart.
PS.....
Stupid question, anyone try a electronic arc lighter with the vapcap?
Like this
Torch lighters always struggle at super high altitudes.
Has anyone tried, or is anyone going to try, this arc lighter? I'm very intrigued! Have one in my Amazon cart now, and will take one for the team if someone isn't already closer to trying it out. Thanks!!!